Readit News logoReadit News
warent commented on GameMaker to be free for non-commercial purposes and have one-time fee license   gamemaker.io/en/blog/game... · Posted by u/flykespice
tensor · 2 years ago
What are some of your favourites?
warent · 2 years ago
I've been using https://cascadeur.com/ to animate the models that I hire artists to make
warent commented on GameMaker to be free for non-commercial purposes and have one-time fee license   gamemaker.io/en/blog/game... · Posted by u/flykespice
gjsman-1000 · 2 years ago
I’ve wanted to make a game for a while now as a side project; but art styling matters immensely to me - more than the gameplay itself, honestly. I feel like I need to become a good artist first…
warent · 2 years ago
If you have the money for it, you should really consider hiring a contract artist to supplement your gaps.

A concept artist and a 3D modeling artist altogether will cost like $3000 for 1 fully complete character that fits your vision. For 2D probably a lot cheaper.

For me, $3000 is worth the months/yrs of saved time.

Of course if you are having fun learning the art side and don't care about the destination as much then ignore this and have fun with it! If you practice every day for a year you'll probably start getting close to what you invision.

EDIT: I'll also add that it's possible most of the aesthetic you're looking for can be achieved via shaders (for both 3D and 2D games). A lot of art looks very different in-game because of shaders doing all kinds of manipulations.

warent commented on Berkeley Mono Typeface   berkeleygraphics.com/type... · Posted by u/gjvc
jdthedisciple · 2 years ago
I recently discovered Monaspace [0] and was fairly impressed by its texture healing feature, besides generally looking nice. And it's free.

[0] https://monaspace.githubnext.com/

warent · 2 years ago
This is awesome, I'll try it out when I get back to the office. Very nice find
warent commented on Nicotine (2016)   gwern.net/nicotine... · Posted by u/blitz_skull
meepmorp · 2 years ago
That's somewhat person dependent. I was a heavy smoker (3-4 packs a day) for several years, but quitting cold turkey was very easy for me. I basically had no cravings unless I was drinking, and those went away after a month.

I realize I'm an outlier.

warent · 2 years ago
WOW that's amazing how different people's experiences can be.

I smoked one pack spread out 2 or 3 days, for about 3 years (in college). Rarely would do a full pack in a day.

Quitting was pure torture. I stayed up 24 hours walking laps around my campus. Took like four full days for cravings to go away.

Haven't had a cigarette in 10 yrs. Occasionally enjoy a cigar without problems

warent commented on The Windows installer of ImageMagick will no longer be signed   github.com/ImageMagick/Im... · Posted by u/pid-1
uxp8u61q · 2 years ago
Wait, their certificates aren't trusted by the os? What's the point of their service, then? A self-signed certificate accomplishes the same result!
warent · 2 years ago
The landing page linked above gives a pretty detailed write-up about the point of their service

Deleted Comment

warent commented on SpaceX files for new 29,988-satellite W-band network   spaceintelreport.com/spac... · Posted by u/ortusdux
edgyquant · 2 years ago
> billionaires temporarily down on their luck

This is such a pretentious, bad faith line that you’ve heard from someone else and are repeating. Yeah I heard it in philosophy class freshman year too. You gloss over the possibility that maybe other people just aren’t as hateful and jealous as you and believe that capital allocating into the hands of those who have created the most value is an efficient economic system. That doesn’t equate to those people believing they will one day create that much value and profit for it. Maybe stop projecting your mindset on others.

warent · 2 years ago
There is no hate here nor anything intended to be a personal attack on specific individuals, but clearly my comment struck a nerve.

This comes across as a saddeningly extreme armchair psychological evaluation and extrapolation to just attack my entire character.

warent commented on SpaceX files for new 29,988-satellite W-band network   spaceintelreport.com/spac... · Posted by u/ortusdux
sschueller · 2 years ago
It should not be possible for a single human to amass any amount over a billion maybe even less. We managed a global cooperate min. tax rate of 12.5% we can manage to also tax billionaires down to billion. Stock can be converted to voting only, don't let them borrow against their stock etc. etc.
warent · 2 years ago
Sharing this in a forum full of "billionaires temporarily down on their luck" is bold and not likely to end well; yet, I agree with you and GP. Hacking should not be synonymous with runaway capitalism, siphoning human energy, and plundering the earth.

Star Trek economy for all!

warent commented on Celebrity Flights   celebrityflight.com/... · Posted by u/__natty__
qeternity · 2 years ago
> Your comment comes across as yet another average joe randomly defending billionaires wrecking the world while we take the consequences of it.

This is so painfully, hilariously wrong that I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. You could vaporize all billionaires in the world and it wouldn’t make any detectable difference to climate change.

warent · 2 years ago
In the same way that vaporizing vicious dictators--subtracting how many people they personally killed by their own hands--would have no detectable difference to global murder rate.

This specific idea of limiting CO2 is being taken a bit too out of context of the broader point. Sanctions against Russia hasn't stopped the murder, any more than limiting individual CO2 consumption would stop climate change. Yet both are correct actions because they are steps in the direction of fixing larger issues.

EDIT: clarify wording

warent commented on Celebrity Flights   celebrityflight.com/... · Posted by u/__natty__
monkeywork · 2 years ago
Or maybe the disconnect is on the other side of the coin, let's say every billionaire on that list did zero flights next year - how much of a reduction in the US CO2 emissions does that actually result in. Does it equate in any meaningful (statistically) way or does it just make people like yourself "feel" better?
warent · 2 years ago
Well, I'm glad we're finally on the same page that you are in fact specifically defending top-consuming billionaires. Conversation ends here

u/warent

KarmaCake day10770August 27, 2016
About
As long as it's not a survey and you're not trying to sell me a product, feel free to reach out.

fmt.Printf("%s@%s.engineer", "hello", "wyatt")

View Original