Case in point, I have a series of photos (48) that capture a small statue. The photos are high quality, the object was on a rotating platform. Lighting is consistent. The background is solid black.
These normally are ideal variables for photogrammetry but none of the various common applications and websites do a very good job creating a mesh out of it that isn't super low poly and/or full of holes.
I've been casually scanning huggingface for relevant models to try out but haven't really found anything.
It seems this "new strategy" is basically the brute-force approach.
Maybe a decade or two ago I would've been more optimistic, but it's very much in their economic interests to not have long-lasting immunity.
Crossing my fingers im just a cynic and that im wrong.
But I do wonder, what about insects? Are there more insects because there are more places for them to live?
There is a lot of paid promotion on Wikipedia and highly-motivated vandalism. Just because someone has reserves of ETH, they get to say what a valid edit is? It seems altogether antithetical to the free-knowledge open-source ethic of the WMF.
It is one thing to propose this as an extension for MediaWiki that some rando running a website may use. It's entirely another thing to mock this up as if it's part of Wikidata's own interface.
EDIT: Headline says "Wikipedia" but screenshots are allegedly "Wikidata" which is really different.