Readit NewsIt's the stick of the T.
I would imagine that this type of engineer needs to be carefully managed to stay on tasks that add business-value.
As such, it's not unfair that they are seen as juniors. They are juniors.
Why would you and I, members of the society with our needs met, also need to get money... This massively increases the cost of the programs.
this is the part that i don't get...
(and allows some people who don't technically qualify to fall through the gaps)
If you receive an extra $10,000 that you say you don't need, you could receive it and be in a tax band which gets taxed an extra $10,000. That's more straightforward.
The australian law seeks to flip this on its head and make you pay to recommend, and forbids you from declining to recommend.
Right now it only applies to google but the principle is insane. People actively pay google to recommend their sites: it’s the entire basis of google ads!
By threatening to withdraw from a national market, Google seem to be saying that its business model depends on getting its own users by this mechanism.
As such, it's reasonable to believe that the true market price won't remain negative.
I'm not saying there aren't some abusive, nasty cops out there. But the "nice" cops aren't so effective when dealing with nasty people.
Number 1 way to prevent violence during arrests, or avoid arrest is (Ding Ding!) BE RESPECTFUL.
It seems like every decade we find out everything we did last decade was bad and wrong but now we've finally for sure got it figured out, and this time we know we are right because we have fancier gadgets and more citations in our name.
From Frued to the Food Pyramid it seems that the experts always have just finally figured it out.
So, not experts. (Not in the field they were claiming).
Is there? The study you quoted suggests the opposite. The drug doesn't directly cause fat to melt off. The fat is lost by eating less. Why is the control group eating more? lack of....
The closer analogy is stock trading. Prices move on news. If you have advance knowledge of news, you’re rich. If you learn, for example, that google will soon start favouring links from aged domains, then you buy as many aged domains as you can.
If you learn that google will devalue links from aged domains, then you have two weeks to rid your network of such links.
And if you are a spammer who gets this information from australian news insiders, then you can beat your competition by moving faster.
When the algo changes are released to everyone at once, it’s like how stock markets function: everyone learns the same thing at the same time.
As for why they don’t mention it, perhaps it is too complex to explain in what is clearly a complex topic. Most people who don’t build websites have no idea of the cat and mouse that goes on with seo.
Are you seriously denying that spammers game search engines and try to keep up with algorithms? Look up the black hat seo industry.
It’s on par with denying programmers use keyboards or something. You’re trying to deny a fundamental fact of reality.
Or watch some of Matt Cutt’s videos. He was the public face of googles rules and algorithm changes. His role? Head of webspam
Considering that Wikipedia dates the concept and its rejection back to 1851, you have understood it wrong.
Some people argue this, but never with reference to the actual data, which unambiguously proves them wrong. The UK Department of Work and Pensions' unusually bureaucratic approach to eligibility results in admin spends of a little over £6bn, or around 3% of its total budget. If you could eliminate all those costs you'd be able to pay working age Brits a UBI of around £180 per annum!