im happy for this, but there's all these math and science benchmarks, has anyone ever made a communicates-like-a-human benchmark? or an isn't-frustrating-to-talk-with benchmark?
Readit Newsstainablesteel commented on GPT-5.2 openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/atgctg
stainablesteel commented on Over fifty new hallucinations in ICLR 2026 submissions gptzero.me/news/iclr-2026... · Posted by u/puttycat
Where do you see the authors? All I'm seeing is:
>Anonymous authors
>Paper under double-blind review
you can google the papers and find the arxiv articles where the authors are listed
stainablesteel commented on Over fifty new hallucinations in ICLR 2026 submissions gptzero.me/news/iclr-2026... · Posted by u/puttycat
Surely this is gross professional misconduct? If one of my postdocs did this they would be at risk of being fired. I would certainly never trust them again. If I let it get through, I should be at risk.
As a reviewer, if I see the authors lie in this way why should I trust anything else in the paper? The only ethical move is to reject immediately.
I acknowledge mistakes and so on are common but this is different league bad behaviour.
this brings us to a cultural divide, westerners would see this as a personal scar, as they consider the integrity of the publishing sphere at large to be held up by the integrity of individuals
i clicked on 4 of those papers, and the pattern i saw was middle-eastern, indian, and chinese names
these are cultures where they think this kind of behavior is actually acceptable, they would assume it's the fault of the journal for accepting the paper. they don't see the loss of reputation to be a personal scar because they instead attribute blame to the game.
some people would say it's racist to understand this, but in my opinion when i was working with people from these cultures there was just no other way to learn to cooperate with them than to understand them, it's an incredibly confusing experience to be working with them until you understand the various differences between your own culture and theirs
I don't understand why Youtube would do this. Both applying these kinds of "enhancements" to video and to do so without consent or even informing people. How is this a smart move?
We need more people experimenting with creating a better platform for content creators. Not least so people like Beato, but not as well known, don't constantly get harassed by fraudulent and incorrect copyright infringement claims.
yeah it's foolish, the platform should just remain the platform, any attempt at improving engagement should be done by the creators or else this whole system would slowly collapse from frustration and move to a different website
Obviously made up...
This ad did the rounds last week and people were talking in the comments about this scenario.
Sure it could've happened, but odds are this is just made up.
this seems reasonable to me, i don't have schizophrenia but i'm pretty sure i'd start stabbing a fridge if I ever saw it give me an advertisement
wow, that's seriously hilarious
it's so ugly that it shows their desperation, who would ever need this?
stainablesteel commented on NASA chief suggests SpaceX may be booted from moon mission cnn.com/2025/10/20/scienc... · Posted by u/voxleone
it's really just a massive sign of disrespect, clearly there's no one capable of competing with spacex, who is already known for beating deadlines, but they insist on insulting them like this
why?
"it's 10 years from now and they're behind schedule", what kind of schedule is this?
stainablesteel commented on This map is not upside down maps.com/this-map-is-not-... · Posted by u/aagha
north makes more sense because it's closer to the direction our solar system is moving
spitting-drink-out-laughing.gif
but how would these airpods really be able to know you're in the EU? this should be easily hackable
stainablesteel commented on Nepal moves to block Facebook, X, YouTube and others aljazeera.com/news/2025/9... · Posted by u/saikatsg
Blocking Signal or Reddit sounds bizarre for a civilized democratic country. What sense can that make other than denying people the right for privacy of personal communications or uncensored information access? I am very surprised Nepal goes this way.
maybe this is odd but i just have to ask, do you consider reddit usage to be the sign of a civilized democracy?