Readit News logoReadit News
slededit commented on Mysterious Laser Turret Appears on US Navy Destroyer USS Dewey   thedrive.com/the-war-zone... · Posted by u/smacktoward
coredog64 · 6 years ago
That would make this an illegal weapon system according to the Geneva Convention. Weapons that are intended to injure rather than kill are prohibited.
slededit · 6 years ago
That’s not the right reading of the convention. The rule is against unnecessary suffering and even excessive lethality. For example hollow point rounds are more effective at killing but solid rounds have the same disabling effect and give the recipient a chance of survival. Hollow point bullets are banned by the convention.

Its also illegal to use excessive calibre bullets against human targets. Even though such large projectiles are much more likely to kill.

The exact phrasing is:

“It is prohibited to employ weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering.”

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul...

slededit commented on How Not to Die (2007)   paulgraham.com/die.html... · Posted by u/sellingwebsite
CPLX · 6 years ago
Yeah exactly.

Things were really really different then. Youtube was two years old, Facebook had only been open to non students for less than a year. Things like making databases of electronic parts or other less sexy B2B style ideas were often still wide open green fields with almost no competition. Plus just making websites work was tough, the cloud existed but just getting servers to work and stay up was a non trivial part of launching something.

You can't just do the X + Software formula anymore and expect to get anywhere.

slededit · 6 years ago
2007 was In the shadow of the post 2000 crash. People were still debating with me if going in to Computer Science even made sense (aren’t they sending all those jobs to India?). The financial crisis would happen just a few months later and take almost 10 years to recover.

There’s a bias when looking at the past. We tend to assume the future was both inevitable and easily predictable. Not like these uncertain times today.

Now pre-2000s was a little different. VCs were taking to me on the phone about my “robotics” company. I was 10.

slededit commented on Comcast Is Lobbying Against DNS Encryption   vice.com/en_us/article/9k... · Posted by u/president
growse · 6 years ago
Do you mean Dan kaminsky's issue from 2008? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Kaminsky#Flaw_in_DNS)

If so, this was fixed... in 2008.

slededit · 6 years ago
Fixed is much too strong a word. Mitigated is more descriptive. From your link:

> This fix is widely seen as a stopgap measure, as it only makes the attack up to 65,536 times harder. An attacker willing to send billions of packets can still corrupt names.

slededit commented on Edward Snowden on The Joe Rogan Experience [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=efs3Q... · Posted by u/juandazapata
waffle_ss · 6 years ago
Joe is not a master interviewer. Compare him to someone who does a lot of research ahead of time and comes prepared with thought-provoking questions, and can keep pace with the deep conversations, like say a Tim Ferriss.

Joe does little research on most guests (mostly due to the sheer volume of guests I'm sure), which could be a more stylistic choice if he were a deft interviewer who could think on his feet and dig deep anyway, but he's not. He's an everyman and asks very surface-level questions. As you say guests are (usually) given wide latitude to own the mic, which works great when it's a guest with a compelling narrative. It works terribly when the guest is very ideological or has some sort of agenda they are adept at selling.

The times he does challenge a guest (sometimes way too aggressively as others in the thread have shown), oftentimes he has missed the point entirely, and the guest has to back up and try to patch the conversation. Once that happens a couple times the flow of the interview is really disturbed and it takes a long time to recover.

I like Joe as a person, and admire his discipline, but to call him a master interviewer would be as accurate as calling him a master comedian because he has been grinding so long.

slededit · 6 years ago
He is in the style of Larry King, who famously doesn't do research so he can put himself in the shoes of the audience and ask questions that would be on their mind. It's a valid technique and works well with a laymen audience. What you are describing is a totally different type of show that goes more in depth on fewer subjects.
slededit commented on 38 People are looking at this post right now   twitter.com/OphirHarpaz/s... · Posted by u/joeyespo
oxplot · 6 years ago
%99.999 of people aren't going to look up the legitimacy of this. Why spend development effort where the likelihood of getting caught is so low. And even when "getting caught" isn't that big a deal.
slededit · 6 years ago
Because the FTC only needs to look at it once for them to give you a big fine or put you out of business. They take time but they do get around to these things. I was watching an old taped documentary on YouTube, and when I looked up the products in the commercials a good number of them were taken down by the FTC.
slededit commented on Taiwan managed to build high-speed rail. Why can't California?   desertsun.com/story/opini... · Posted by u/jrmg
bobthepanda · 6 years ago
Rail has upper capacity in the ranges of 60-90k passengers per hour, whereas car lanes are in the range of 2-3K passengers per hour in free flowing conditions. Granted that 60-90K figure doesn't involve people trying to shove furniture, pets etc. into their vehicles, but you could move quite a lot more with rail.
slededit · 6 years ago
Rail is also used as part of the evacuation, but most people will want their car so they can carry enough supplies to last for the evacuation period. In fact one of the most egregious aspects of the Katrina disaster was New Orleans explicitly told Amtrak their trains were unnecessary [1].

>"We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black. "The city declined."

[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09...

slededit commented on Taiwan managed to build high-speed rail. Why can't California?   desertsun.com/story/opini... · Posted by u/jrmg
bobthepanda · 6 years ago
Katrina and Harvey showed that at best, evacuating cities with highways is an extremely long, drawn out process that will most likely leave the most poor and destitute (who don't have cars) totally stranded.
slededit · 6 years ago
They don't completely solve the problem, but it would be much harder to evacuate the cities without the highway system in place.
slededit commented on Is Canada Broken?   thewalrus.ca/democracy-is... · Posted by u/laurex
grawprog · 6 years ago
Maybe it's just where I live, but I don't really see any of what's described in that article from average people. I see the usual election signs out, haven't heard anyone really saying anything either way or even had any conversations about the elections with anyone. The media's been playing it up pretty bad and I've heard some pretty ridiculous campaign ads from all the parties but that's about it.

Haven't heard a lot of white power fascist sentiment either. Sometime last year though I remember they had a rally planned, but there wasn't actually enough of them to have a rally so nobody showed up.

It really bugs me the media's trying to get Canadians to play the same stupid political games as America. Our election system doesn't even work the same here. You don't vote for the prime minister. You vote for the party representitive in your area. This bullshit started back when Trudeau was first running and it's just gotten worse. The political parties here haven't changed. A vote for NDP, liberal or conservative is still the same vote it would have been last election cycle. Their policies are all the same as they've ever been.

slededit · 6 years ago
> You don't vote for the prime minister. You vote for the party representative in your area.

The MPP in my riding gave that line when she came by. We got Ford, and this particular MPP is the least responsive in the entire provincial parliament. Whatever sympathy I had for that line of reasoning is now lost, the fact is your MP or MPP has very little individual power. Much less than a representative has in the USA.

slededit commented on Boeing Engineers Lost Control of the Company   perell.com/blog/boeing-73... · Posted by u/davidperell
brojonat · 6 years ago
> Boeing is pursuing profit at the expense of human lives

To play devil's advocate, this isn't a moral statement. The author is saying this is true based on actual events.

slededit · 6 years ago
I'm almost certain "expense of human lives" didn't come up as a factor on any of the merger pitch decks. Frankly its a huge leap to see that a merger of two successful and relatively safe aircraft manufacturers would be intentionally at the expense of human lives.
slededit commented on I Just Took the World's First 20-Hour Flight   bloomberg.com/news/featur... · Posted by u/valiant-comma
HatchedLake721 · 6 years ago
What’s the connection between flight duration and number of engines?
slededit · 6 years ago
Reliability (ETOPS regulations), as well as the fact long hauls are usually fewer larger flights meaning they use larger aircraft.

u/slededit

KarmaCake day4343November 4, 2015View Original