i think remote work is great, but some early face to face can fix a bunch of problems imo.
Have you been plagued by applicant fraud? We've found for all of our remote engineering roles, we get 100's of amazing applicants who are all fake (clearly not actually in the US) once you get them on a screening call. They're often reading from a script, broken english, and say strange things like they're born and raised in Texas, yet can't speak fluent English or have a heavy accent.
My best guess is it's dev shops overseas who are using an English-speaking "front" person who then delegates the work to other people with the "front" person being the one who joins company meetings, etc.
Really frustrating because it's making us have to do silly things like require photo ID verification over video on the first screening call (which I would rather not inconvenience applicants with, but there are just SO many candidates lying about residing in the US).
With our most recent role, about 60-70% of applicants were fake ("fake" = candidates who lie about living/residing in the US)
in his case i think he more or less knew what he was doing, and showed up on calls, but delegated the work to some other people.
we’d hear people in the background of his audio discussing things really oddly similar to tasks he’d been assigned and had outstanding. he was putting in (bad) PRs at all hours of day and night, and never had any recollection of any email, slack conversation, or his own PRs.
the company fired him after six months or so.
I'm no way rich, but I would not even bother taking the time to go to a lawyer or whatever and do all this kind of paperwork for such a ridiculous amount of money, I'd just ride it however it goes and not care.
no kidding. i wouldn’t sell a 15% stake in a lemonade stand for $100. that doesn’t even cover the hassle of reviewing the contract and signing a bunch of notarized paperwork
Yep, that's exactly it. Your TLS certificate is not sent as string, and neither are your TCP packets, nor the images contained in them. Your URLs shouldn't be either, but it's probably too late for that.
> People try to operate directly on the serialised data using ad-hoc implementations and run into trouble.
That's a whole lot better than the current footgun we have, where
http://http://http://@http://http://?http://#http://
is a valid URL. People don't operate directly on string URLs without trouble either, so at least the structured data is not inviting incorrect usage.> Yep, that's exactly it. Your TLS certificate is not sent as string, and neither are your TCP packets, nor the images contained in them.
...all of those things mentioned have defined serialization. i expect all of them have had security issues because of problems with deserialization code.
any government messaging plan that revolves around twitter was irresponsible. same with whatever other single social media platform you want to name.
do you not make mistakes, or do you not work with anything that matters?
the US criminal justice system, which isn't very popular, seems to be more tolerant to human error than you.
Americans are generally fascinated with people's origins and origin stories. I am sure some of that is historically - unfortunately -racially motivated. But also we are taught from an early age that the United States is a melting pot and we are fascinated by the immigrant story. The motivations on why someone would pick up and leave everyone they know to move to a new unknown place and also the cultures they bring with them.
With that, Americans also don't accept the United States as someplace people are from. Even if you're family has been here for 500 years, people still want to know where you're family came from originally. Only the indigenous Americans are "from" America.
The United States is young and with so many people coming from somewhere else, it is also a chance to connect with history. It can be fun to find an ancestor that fought in the revolutionary war, or was part of the Salem witch trials etc. It makes our history more real, and we have a lot less history to connect to than most of the rest of the world.
For me personally, it somewhat is inspiration and motivation. If any of my ancestors lived a different life, I wouldn't be here. If my great great grandfather didn't survive dysentery in the civil war, I wouldn't be here. I have family that left Ireland during the famine, following their history helps me contextualize big historical events. And helps me realize that people who weren't
I only recently started capturing my 97 year old grandfather's stories. Making it a project had helped me connect more with him. He grew up in a completely different world. Hearing his experiences listening to WWII breaking out or even little things like seeing his first movie and then his first color movie is so much more impactful than reading about the era in a book.
Nonsense.
> Even if you're family has been here for 500 years, people still want to know where you're family came from originally.
I can only recall one person ever being unsatisfied by the name of a state when asking where I was from, and they were satisfied when I named a city.
Why do you think lifting and transporting 1t of grounds takes less energy than lifting and transporting 1t of sand?
Only sand is already conveniently placed in bulk and very dense and does not require pyrolysis to be usable, etc. Almost every process related to sand I can imagine (I am not an expert at making cement in volume) will cost more for coffee grounds.
so many of these ideas seem to hand wave over “we’ll need to implement a whole new waste stream worldwide. don’t mind that we can hardly manage >1 stream as it is”