Readit News logoReadit News
shmoe commented on Supercharger for Business – Tesla   tesla.com/supercharger-fo... · Posted by u/bilsbie
crooked-v · 4 days ago
Who's supposed to bee doing the maintenance? Elon mass fired most of the Supercharger team, including maintenance workers, in the middle of last year (https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/musk-d...).
shmoe · 4 days ago
They did scramble to hire some back, and I do see a truck repairing stalls at a few of the local superchargers. So someone's doing it! :)

Could be a volunteer at this point.

shmoe commented on Electric cars produce less brake dust pollution than combustion-engine cars   modernengineeringmarvels.... · Posted by u/tzs
Swizec · 2 months ago
> My model Y can effect a very reasonable stop in traffic without touching the brake pedal except to hold the car at the end.

My manual car could do this 20 years ago. My fully ICE motorcycle can do it today.

I know engine braking is cool but it’s not some amazing new thing only EVs can do. Altho granted it only produces heat and noise in petrol vehicles. But it also makes your heart sing so that’s nice

shmoe · 2 months ago
The difference is neither of those generates gasoline on an ICE vehicle.
shmoe commented on EverQuest   filfre.net/2025/07/everqu... · Posted by u/dmazin
don_neufeld · 2 months ago
I was there.

My first pay stub had Verant on it, I joined shortly before the SOE transition.

One thing maybe not well known outside of the company was that the MMO subscription revenue enabled a hotbed of experimentation. There was an MMO RTS which never shipped, and several other takes on “can we make genre X an MMO?” that I can’t remember. And then SWG, obviously.

EQ2 had all kinds of interesting people on it as a result - Ken Perlin did the lip sync work (driving facial animations from dialog), Brian Hook worked on the rendered for a while. I’m sure there were others.

Then there’s all the things we didn’t do. I read the complete Harry Potter series specifically because we were in talks with JK Rowling to do a HP MMO, but negotiations failed.

Crazy times.

[addendum] Several of the people in the article are no longer with us (Brad McQuaid, and Kelly Flock at least)

The office park that SOE was located in on Terman Court was also demolished years ago. I remember standing at the door to my office on my last day, looking out the window at the eucalyptus trees and thinking I was never going to see the place again.

I was right.

shmoe · 2 months ago
I had such amazing times in the SWG beta.. it's a shame it never found its footing. It's ambition did it in.

Thank you!

shmoe commented on My home servers are not a homelab   blog.nradk.com/posts/home... · Posted by u/nradk
shmoe · 2 months ago
production environment @ home
shmoe commented on U.S. bombs Iranian nuclear sites   bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg3r... · Posted by u/mattcollins
tus666 · 3 months ago
260ft is around 79m. The bombs can penetrate around 60m of concrete. So one bomb, probably not, but they are able to follow each other in quick succession meaning 2 or three should be able to do the job quite easily, with accurate GPS positioning.
shmoe · 3 months ago
ahh.. in my mind it was multiple hits spread over an area. This does make more sense.
shmoe commented on U.S. bombs Iranian nuclear sites   bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg3r... · Posted by u/mattcollins
tptacek · 3 months ago
I think Netanyahu belongs in prison, and Trump, the less said the better, but: couldn't have happened to a nicer unauthorized weapons-grade uranium enrichment facility dug into the side of a mountain hours outside of population centers.

If you haven't already, I highly recommend reading up on the GBU-57 "bunker buster" bomb, because it is some Merrie Melodies Acme brand munitions. It's deliberately as heavy as they can make a bomb, not with explosives but just with mass. They should have shaped it like a giant piano.

shmoe · 3 months ago
From what I read, they likely still couldn't penetrate the halls at Fordow, which are about 260 feet underground and encased in 30000psi concrete. Did we even do anything there?
shmoe commented on SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly   twitter.com/NASASpaceflig... · Posted by u/Ankaios
DoesntMatter22 · 3 months ago
It's not a regression every flight. The last flight was pretty successful. You are acting as is this isn't an unprecedented launch vehicle. Even if they lost 20 in a row, as long as they get there that's all that matters. Space X has shown how well things work once they get something working.
shmoe · 3 months ago
They have yet to re-light an engine in space, which has been a mission milestone several times now. Either the ship explodes in hot staging, orbit, or re-entry (and now, static testing) and hasn't made it to the controlled spot in the ocean in quite some time.
shmoe commented on SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly   twitter.com/NASASpaceflig... · Posted by u/Ankaios
DoesntMatter22 · 3 months ago
They literally left astronauts stranded on the space station
shmoe · 3 months ago
Falcon/Dragon = Successful program, never had the problems Starship has had

Starship = regressing every flight.

This isn't hard to parse man.

shmoe commented on SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly   twitter.com/NASASpaceflig... · Posted by u/Ankaios
jillesvangurp · 3 months ago
Falcon also was hard. They had a few failures and nearly went bankrupt in the process of successfully launching for the first time.

> the entire program regresses in on itself in terms of milestones.

The alternative would be looking at the competing programs from Boeing, Blue Origin, etc. It's not like they are hitting their milestones particularly well with their more traditional waterfall approach. The point of rapid iteration is that it is an inherently open ended process that has no milestones other than to launch the next iteration within weeks/months of the previous one. Which they have been doing fairly consistently.

If SpaceX gets starship in a launcheable and recoverable state, they'll still have many years of competing against competitors that have to rely on single launch vehicles exclusively. They would be very early to market. And there's a decent chance they might start nailing things with a few more launches.

shmoe · 3 months ago
They didn't regress like starship has though... they literally just went from orbit to controlled landing in ocean and catching the booster on a fork to the ships blowing up in orbit or not making it there and the boosters aborting the catch for a controlled landing offshore or blowing up as well.

Now they have regressed to blowing up on the pad during static testing.

Seems very different to me than the Falcon story, 100%. Granted, they had luck too.

shmoe commented on SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly   twitter.com/NASASpaceflig... · Posted by u/Ankaios
mrtksn · 3 months ago
So apparently SpaceX is building many of those all the time and the latest spotted one in development is Starship 42: https://starship-spacex.fandom.com/wiki/Ship_42_(S42)

I guess how much of a setback this is will be determined by how much damage is there on the facilities and the nature of the cause of the explosion(do they need to re-work the next 6 already being assembled so it doesn't happen again?).

shmoe · 3 months ago
They cant seem to match launch cadence to ship progression. This will most certainly set them back a few more weeks beyond the end of this month.

u/shmoe

KarmaCake day220December 29, 2020View Original