Readit News logoReadit News
sennalen commented on Uncle Sam shouldn't own Intel stock   wsj.com/opinion/uncle-sam... · Posted by u/aspenmayer
GeekyBear · 2 days ago
Didn't we already cross this particular Rubicon during the auto bailout a decade ago?

Other examples:

> Since the 1950s, the federal government has stepped in as a backstop for railroads, farm credit, airlines (twice), automotive companies, savings and loan companies, banks, and farmers.

Every situation has its own idiosyncrasies, but in each, the federal government intervened to stabilize a critical industry, avoiding systemic collapse that surely would have left the average taxpayer much worse off. In some instances, the treasury guaranteed loans, meaning that creditors would not suffer if the relevant industry could not generate sufficient revenue to pay back the loans, leading to less onerous interest rates.

A second option was that the government would provide loans at relatively low interest rates to ensure that industries remained solvent.

In a third option, the United States Treasury would take an ownership stake in some of these companies in what amounts to an “at-the-market” offering, in which the companies involved issue more shares at their current market price to the government in exchange for cash to continue business operations.

https://chicagopolicyreview.org/2022/08/23/piece-of-the-acti...

sennalen · a day ago
This isn't a bailout, though. It's strong-arming.
sennalen commented on Uncle Sam shouldn't own Intel stock   wsj.com/opinion/uncle-sam... · Posted by u/aspenmayer
adrian_b · a day ago
True, but who knows how much later that would have happened, and how the market would have looked by then.

The false information about the future of Itanium scared almost all of them to surrender, about in the same way as the fictional Strategic Defense Initiative had scared the Russians.

sennalen · a day ago
SDI was real and led to the missile defense systems that the US has fielded today.
sennalen commented on XSLT removal will break multiple government and regulatory sites   github.com/whatwg/html/is... · Posted by u/colejohnson66
ioasuncvinvaer · 4 days ago
But why would a server send me xml instead of html? From the thread you can see that the servers already serve html so why is there a second way to present that content via xslt?
sennalen · 4 days ago
keeping data orthogonal to presentation

Dead Comment

sennalen commented on NASA Is Worth Saving   caseyhandmer.wordpress.co... · Posted by u/EvgeniyZh
tlb · 2 months ago
I agree that SLS sucks because of congressional meddling to award contracts in strategic districts. But you can't have something like NASA without that. Any large government agency is doomed to have to spread work around. Only a private company run by a fearsome CEO is able to say No, we're going to go with the best solution instead of the politically favored one.
sennalen · 2 months ago
All the contractors and pork districts could still be engaged in doing something more useful.
sennalen commented on Lock-Free Rust: How to Build a Rollercoaster While It's on Fire   yeet.cx/blog/lock-free-ru... · Posted by u/r3tr0
gpderetta · 3 months ago
The claim that the lock free array is faster then the locked variant is suspicious. The lock free array is performing a CAS for every operation, this is going to dominate[1]. A plain mutex would do two CAS (or just one if it is a spin lock), so the order of magnitude difference is not explainable by the lock free property.

Of course if the mutex array is doing a linear scan to find the insertion point that would explain the difference but: a) I can't see the code for the alternative and b) there is no reason why the mutex variant can't use a free list.

Remember:

- Lock free doesn't automatically means faster (still it has other properties that might be desirable even if slower)

- Never trust a benchmark you didn't falsify yourself.

[1] when uncontended; when contended cache coherence cost will dominate over everything else, lock-free or not.

sennalen · 3 months ago
The bottleneck is context switching
sennalen commented on America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside   theregister.com/2025/04/2... · Posted by u/rntn
chaostheory · 4 months ago
My guess is that they were overtly trying to show Russia that we aren’t a direct threat to them anymore in the vain attempt to avoid fighting a two front war in the upcoming global war. Unfortunately, Putin is likely going to keep invading up to Germany’s Fulda Gap. If we’re still a part of NATO, we would have no choice but to declare war.
sennalen · 4 months ago
This is WW3 playing out. Russia installed its people in America to dismantle our defenses.
sennalen commented on The Future of Compute: Nvidia's Crown Is Slipping   mohitdagarwal.substack.co... · Posted by u/wilson090
chneu · 4 months ago
Gosh, I have a coworker who acts like gaming GPUs are the only hardware that matters.

I've tried explaining that one or two AI data center clients for Nvidia dwarfs the entire gaming GPU market, but he just doesn't get it.

sennalen · 4 months ago
AI makes a lot of money. But games are what matter
sennalen commented on X’s director of engineering, Haofei Wang, has left the company   theverge.com/twitter/6348... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
osigurdson · 5 months ago
In reality, that boss probably was just repeating something that he heard - hoping that his boss would like how it sounds. I recall similar parables in early 00's agile. It is a lot easier to say things like this than come up with an actual strategy.
sennalen · 5 months ago
The context I have heard the ham and eggs analogy was for certain scrum rituals that were supposed to be for ham people only (ie, excluding people without a stake in the outcome). Someone probably told this boss to butt out of a meeting.
sennalen commented on HTTP/3 is everywhere but nowhere   httptoolkit.com/blog/http... · Posted by u/doener
ralferoo · 5 months ago
For me, I think the biggest issue with large scale deployment of HTTP 3 is that it increases the surface area of potentially vulnerable code that needs to be kept patched and maintained. I'd far rather have the OS provide a verified safe socket layer, and a dynamically linked SSL library, that can be easily updated without any of the application layer needing to worry about security bugs in the networking layer.

Additionally, I'd posit that for most client applications, a few extra ms of latency on a request isn't really a big deal. Sure, I can imagine applications that might care, but I can't think of any applications I have (as a developer or as a user) where I'd trade to have more complexity on the networking layer for potentially saving a few ms per request, or more likely just on the first request.

sennalen · 5 months ago
Connection migration sounds like a security nightmare

u/sennalen

KarmaCake day39February 3, 2025View Original