They didn't put Opus 4.5 on the model card to compare
Readit Newsrw2 commented on Gemini 3 Flash: Frontier intelligence built for speed blog.google/products/gemi... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
Having used it compared to Nano Banana:
-The latency is still too high, lower than 10 seconds for nano banana and around 25 seconds for GPT image 1.5
-The quality is higher but not a jump like previous google models to Nano Banana Pro. Nano banana pro is still at least equivalently good or better in my opinion.
Gemini 3 in antigravity is significantly better than Claude code with either Opus or Sonnet that I struggle to see how they can compete. And I'm someone with the 100 dollar/month plan.
I can't even use Opus for a day before it runs out before. This will make it better but Antigravity has way better UI and also bug solving.
I've played around with Gemini 3 Pro in Cursor, and honestly: I find it to be significantly worse than Sonnet 4.5. I've also had some problems that only Claude Code has been able to really solve; Sonnet 4.5 in there consistently performs better than Sonnet 4.5 anywhere else.
I think Anthropic is making the right decisions with their models. Given that software engineering is probably one of the very few domains of AI usage that is driving real, serious revenue: I have far better feelings about Anthropic going into 2026 than any other foundation model. Excited to put Opus 4.5 through its paces.
Gemini 3 in antigravity is amazing
I would pose a question differently, under his leadership did Meta achieve good outcome?
If the answer is yes, then better to keep him, because he has already proved himself and you can win in the long-term. With Meta's pockets, you can always create a new department specifically for short-term projects.
If the answer is no, then nothing to discuss here.
I believe that the fact that Chinese models are beating the crap of of Llama means it's a huge no.
rw2 commented on Show HN: Dayflow – A git log for your day github.com/JerryZLiu/Dayf... · Posted by u/jerryliu12
Could easily dismiss those concerns by looking at the source code instead of snooping around their profile, especially if you’re on GitHub anyway :)
The way I would do it is I release a open source code without any spyware then prebuilt dmgs that contained it. Thus the lazy people would all get it if they dont self compile. As compiling a new thing takes another 1/2 hour or more for most people, they would be too lazy to do it.
rw2 commented on Show HN: Dayflow – A git log for your day github.com/JerryZLiu/Dayf... · Posted by u/jerryliu12
I love the product concept but the fact this person has an almost empty github and suddenly launches an app that can easily be spyware concerns me a lot :). A lot of security concerns with password etc.
Given that the world is headed towards a surveillance dystopia and Peter Thiel being involved I think I should buy some stocks now. What happened end of 2024 that kicked off its price hike?
I think the future with AI has no room for Palantir.
Basically, their entire premise is go into some place, collect all the data and build models that are useful on top that data.
Those models are now pretty much useless in the age of LLMs as the LLMs are so powerful you dont need custom models to predict behavior anymore. The new meta in this space is probably someone taking all the data into some db and using LLM on it either through training or interpretation.
Woz gave a lecture in one of my classes years ago and I came away impressed. He was obviously a brilliant engineer. "Naivete" is generally used in a negative manner but he had just enough naivete to get through life happy. He talked about all the chips he redesigned as a teen and it did not sound like bragging at all. We need more Woz's and less Jobs in this world.
Disagree, almost of all the accomplishments in humanity are driven by people like Steve Jobs not Woz. Elon Musk could be said to be a second iteration, a technical person extremely good at sales that can pursue and sell a vision.
There are a lot of people who want to be happy. Let them be happy, but it's the relentless builders/dreamers who pushes through the entire journey of getting a product out there to the people.
Ooh, VS Code integration for Claude Code sounds nice. I do feel like Claude Code works better than the native Cursor agent mode.
Edit: How do you install it? Running `/ide` says "Make sure your IDE has the Claude Code extension", where do you get that?
Claude code is a poorer version of aider or cline in VScode. I have better results using them than using claude code alone.