Readit News logoReadit News
raylad commented on Impeccable Style   impeccable.style... · Posted by u/noemit
raylad · a month ago
"DON'T use pure white or pure black..."

This is something I hate: gray text. Designers love it but it is often very illegible because of inadequate contrast.

raylad commented on Show HN: Mantic.sh – A structural code search engine for AI agents   github.com/marcoaapfortes... · Posted by u/marcoaapfortes
raylad · a month ago
MANTIC_IGNORE_PATTERNS seems not to be implemented, or am I missing something?
raylad commented on Maybe the default settings are too high   raptitude.com/2025/12/may... · Posted by u/htk
skybrian · 2 months ago
When learning to play a musical instrument and practicing a new song, some common advice is to play it as slowly as you can stand, to learn the motions well.
raylad · 2 months ago
Or, never play it faster than you can play it perfectly.
raylad commented on Cloth Simulation   cloth.mikail-khan.com/... · Posted by u/adamch
raylad · 2 months ago
Feels more like a spiderweb simulation. The fibers are sticky and stretchy.
raylad commented on Bag of words, have mercy on us   experimental-history.com/... · Posted by u/ntnbr
raincole · 2 months ago
> “Bag of words” is a also a useful heuristic for predicting where an AI will do well and where it will fail. “Give me a list of the ten worst transportation disasters in North America” is an easy task for a bag of words, because disasters are well-documented. On the other hand, “Who reassigned the species Brachiosaurus brancai to its own genus, and when?” is a hard task for a bag of words, because the bag just doesn’t contain that many words on the topic

It is... such a retrospective narrative. It's so obvious that the author learned about this example first than came with the reasoning later, just to fit in his view of LLM.

Imaging if ChatGPT answered this question correctly. Would that change the author's view? Of course not! They'll just say:

> “Bag of words” is a also a useful heuristic for predicting where an AI will do well and where it will fail. Who reassigned the species Brachiosaurus brancai to its own genus, and when?” is an easy task for a bag of words, because the information has appeared in the words it memorizes.

I highly doubt this author has predicted that "bag of Words" can do image editing before OpenAI released that.

raylad · 2 months ago
I tested this with ChatGPT-5.1 and Gemini 3.0. Both correctly (according to Wikipedia at least) stated that George Olshevsky assigned it to its own genus in 1991.

This is because there are many words about how to do web searches.

raylad commented on Claude 4.5 Opus' Soul Document   lesswrong.com/posts/vpNG9... · Posted by u/thm
raylad · 2 months ago
It’s a lovely set of aspirations for how a model should behave. But unclear to me is the extent to which expressing those aspirations actually compels the model to follow them.
raylad commented on Where's the shovelware? Why AI coding claims don't add up   mikelovesrobots.substack.... · Posted by u/dbalatero
jdlshore · 5 months ago
If you’re a CTO who can no longer program, the solution isn’t to use AI to program again; the solution is to hire people who can program. The question at hand is whether AI helps your developers, not whether it helps you. You’re the CTO. It’s not your job to program.
raylad · 5 months ago
Some of the projects I've been doing are for myself in other businesses, automating processes that were time consuming or... annoying.

Others are for start-ups that are pre-money, pre-revenue where I can build things myself without having to deal with hiring people.

In a larger organization, certainly I'd delegate to other people, but if it's just for me or new unfunded start-ups, this is working out very well.

And it's not that I "can no longer program". I could program, it's just that I don't find the nuts and bolts of it as interesting as I used to and am more focused on functionality, algorithm, and UI.

raylad commented on Where's the shovelware? Why AI coding claims don't add up   mikelovesrobots.substack.... · Posted by u/dbalatero
raylad · 5 months ago
I used to be a full-time developer back in the day. Then I was a manager. Then I was a CTO. I stopped doing the day-to-day development and even stopped micro-managing the detailed design.

When I tried to code again, I found I didn't really have the patience for it -- having to learn new frameworks, APIs, languages, tricky little details, I used to find it engrossing: it had become annoying.

But with tools like Claude Code and my knowledge about how software should be designed and how things should work, I am able to develop big systems again.

I'm not 20% more productive than I was. I'm not 10x more productive than I was either. I'm infinity times more productive because I wouldn't be doing it at all otherwise, realistically: I'd either hire someone to do it, or not do it, if it wasn't important enough to go through the trouble to hire someone.

Sure, if you are a great developer and spend all day coding and love it, these tools may just be a hindrance. But if you otherwise wouldn't do it at all they are the opposite of that.

raylad commented on Claude Code: Now in Beta in Zed   zed.dev/blog/claude-code-... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
raylad · 5 months ago
Does this use the API or can it use the Claude subscription?

That wasn't stated or perhaps I missed it.

raylad commented on White House in Talks with Intel for 10% U.S. Government Stake   wsj.com/tech/intel-us-gov... · Posted by u/sugarpimpdorsey
raylad · 6 months ago
We need to be doing much, much more of this so that the country has ownership of substantial percentages of the critical infrastructure, including AI. That seems to be one of the only ways that the citizens in general will be able to share in the fruits of the technology, similarly to how Alaskan citizens get payments from petroleum.

u/raylad

KarmaCake day1097January 15, 2020View Original