Readit News logoReadit News
r_smart commented on YouTube is trying to reward “quality” content   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/okket
erikpukinskis · 6 years ago
Have you thought about the possibility that our language has been constructed to give people like you more ammunition against others? And given other less ammunition to use against people like you? Words like "bitch", "bossy", etc. Also cultural norms for what kinds of emotions you interpret as "too much" if it’s a woman but “oh crap I should listen” if it’s a man, etc.

I have no idea who you are, so just a question about where you’re at in thinking about this.

And do I understand correctly your proposal? That we should all aspire to be unaffected by the words of others. And if someone is negatively affected by words it is their failure, not the failure of the speaker or the failure of the group they are in together.

r_smart · 6 years ago
|the possibility that our language has been constructed to give people like you more ammunition against others?

The idea that the language was constructed is pretty silly. It's such a twisted hodge-podge of borrowed ideas. Besides, other languages with far different heritages will hold very similar words and terms as ours. As for the idea of having more ammunition, You'd have to actually provide some evidence for the idea that there's more plentiful / harsh language available to 'people like me'. Particularly when I've seen both of the words you cite used plentifully towards a broad swathe of people.

|That we should all aspire to be unaffected by the words of others.

Yes.

|And if someone is negatively affected by words it is their failure, not the failure of the speaker or the failure of the group they are in together.

Not exactly, no. A person being an asshole is an asshole. Your reaction to it doesn't absolve them of that behavior, even if you responded positively for some reason. However, letting some random asshole ruin your day by saying something you don't like is just setting you up for constant failure, as you are so easily driven into a negative emotional state. I'm suggesting a coping strategy, one among many, to guide a person in navigating a world full of adversity.

r_smart commented on YouTube is trying to reward “quality” content   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/okket
diminoten · 6 years ago
Yeah, I'm all about the idea behind letting people express themselves without being censored, but the stark reality is that the people pushing the envelope here are saying some pretty damaging things about other people in a hurtful and escalating way.

I don't know how to square these two thoughts.

r_smart · 6 years ago
'Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.'

Granted, it's aspirational.

r_smart commented on A researcher needed three hours to identify me from my DNA   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/pseudolus
dboat · 6 years ago
Had the same experience with blizzard support a while ago. Now I follow the above poster's advice and use it as a secondary password, but make it pronounceable at least.
r_smart · 6 years ago
Yeah, I shouldn't have said 'gibberish' but rather random words / lies.

Just don't answer the questions basically.

r_smart commented on Great developers are raised, not hired   sizovs.net/2019/04/10/the... · Posted by u/eduardsi
stcredzero · 6 years ago
I keep looking back on past comments and finding stuff like that. I wonder if someone has come up with a homophone/typo mistake filter? Being able to turn that on for opponents one would like to discredit would be really insidious and evil. What if some evil genius at Google has come up with a hidden way to do this in Chrome? Would we ever know? Maybe not, if the frequency was kept low enough.
r_smart · 6 years ago
The number of times I screw up there/their or hear/here is infuriating. I know the goddamn difference, but these idiot fingers keep getting it wrong!
r_smart commented on A researcher needed three hours to identify me from my DNA   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/pseudolus
btgeekboy · 6 years ago
Not the direct point of the article, but as an aside, it really concerns me how easy it is to find a mother's maiden name these days, considering how often it's used as at least a partial proof of identity.
r_smart · 6 years ago
You should be giving gibberish answers to those anyway. They're probably stored as plaintext, but on the off chance they're not, treat them as a backup password and don't answer the question honestly.
r_smart commented on Tesla Shakes Up Model 3 Lineup   thedrive.com/tech/27400/t... · Posted by u/Pharmakon
JustSomeNobody · 6 years ago
> ...some small number of places in specific circumstances..

Airport parking/shuttle service. They could even augment the AI by using markers in the roadways. That's about as autonomous as we're going to get in the next decade.

r_smart · 6 years ago
Driving through airport terminals is possibly one of the most chaotic possible environments, with people almost suicidally throwing themselves in front of you, not to even speak of the cabs, double lane parking, security guards telling you to move and other things. It's probably one of the harder environments to automate for outside of inclement weather.
r_smart commented on Julian Assange arrested in London   bbc.co.uk/news/uk-4789173... · Posted by u/kragniz
firethief · 6 years ago
But we have to know which team they're on!!
r_smart · 6 years ago
As I understand the term 'neo-liberal' it's kind of a hybrid ideology that strides the two US political parties. Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton are both neo-liberals, though ostensibly, opposed to each other. It's basically the worst of the political philosophies espoused by the two parties. Basically it means more authoritarian control and the prosecution of wars all over the planet for the sake of establishing a new world order.
r_smart commented on Katie Bouman, the computer scientist behind the first black hole image   bbc.com/news/science-envi... · Posted by u/tigerlily
SmellyGeekBoy · 6 years ago
> This is what makes me somewhat feel that this focus on her is not quite fair.

Thought experiment: if you saw an article titled "Jony Ive: The Man Behind The iPhone" would you be commenting on how unfair it is to single him out? After all, he just designed the thing, a huge team of people built the software and the hardware that actually made it possible.

r_smart · 6 years ago
People do that all the time when everything Apple gets attributed to Steve Jobs.
r_smart commented on Ford CEO says the company 'overestimated' self-driving cars   engadget.com/2019/04/10/f... · Posted by u/paganel
dreamcompiler · 6 years ago
I had the same issues in a Tesla. I adjusted the following distance down to dissuade people from jumping in front of me, but that felt even more unsafe. Seemed like there was no good solution.
r_smart · 6 years ago
Rather than apply the brakes, barring the person jumping in front of you and braking, it could just stop applying the accelerator. Nice easy slowdown to create the gap without brake-jobbing somebody behind you.
r_smart commented on Facebook showed me my data is everywhere and I have absolute no control over it   buzzfeednews.com/article/... · Posted by u/hhs
clucas · 6 years ago
No it doesn't. The argument speaks for itself. If I murder someone in cold blood, then get up the next morning and call a press conference saying "Murder is wrong! We need to put a stop to murder!" no one would chime in and say "No way, murder is perfectly fine, you just did it last night!"

Call the news orgs out for doing the same reprehensible activity, yes. But let's judge the arguments about which activities are reprehensible on their own merits.

r_smart · 6 years ago
|no one would chime in and say "No way, murder is perfectly fine, you just did it last night!"

No, but they might say: "Why should we listen to you!? MURDERER!" Then proceed to stone you to death, and see who dares get up on the podium to make an announcement about stoning.

u/r_smart

KarmaCake day890July 22, 2016View Original