Interesting!! I'll talk with my brother about this - sounds very cool!

I feel that's not a reasonable comparison, filming something with a camera versus wearing a headset.

While I agree that holding up a phone in front of your face presents some degree of being disconnected from the action, I feel wearing a headset where one's entire view of the scene is a computed feed via cameras is totally disconnected.

So I do still agree that it wasn't a reasonable suggestion that people would be filming important life events while wearing their APV headset.

I'm curious about what happens after. Humanity has been wiped out and the AI is left alone along with the remains of the natural ecosystem, what does it want to do next?

That's very cool, and right now it's a good idea, but I strongly suspect GPT only looks clever and does a good job in isolation. If everyone starts using it product announcements will start looking very similar, and they'll lose a lot of their impact.

This is definitely the case with cover letters for jib applications. The ones written by GPT appear to be pretty obvious - my guesses could be wrong, but after seeing most applications not having a cover letter for years to most applications having one over the past few months, I suspect GPT is involved, and there's a distinct 'style' that seems to be showing up.

Using GPT could be the 'bootstrap ui' of product announcements. It looks great on its own, but put it next to a bunch of other companies and they all fail to stand out.

Good question. She actually got a degree in chemical engineering not CS, but then switched over to fulltime software dev at her company a couple of years out of school as she liked that more -- so yeah, I would say so.

My favorite language for teaching kids to code and which I taught my daughter starting around 9 or 10, is Ruby. Expressive syntax, easy to read, good introduction to objects. Her first real program was a treasure hunt game in the terminal, using classes, inheritance, methods, and conditionals, etc.

It didn't have the cute graphics side of things, but she learned all the concepts well (she now has a degree in engineering and being paid to write code)

> You could even spawn a process to remove the pam_duress module so the threat actor won't be able to see if the duress module was available.

Knowing almost nothing about networking, isn't the way Facebook handles networking somewhat of a monolithic anti-pattern? Why is a single update responsible for taking out multiple services and why wouldn't each product or even each region within each product have their own routes, for resiliency which can then be used to rollout changes slower?

By having a large centralized and monolithic system, aren't they guaranteeing that mistakes cause huge splash damage and don't separate concerns?

I would argue you should make a new family. People who eschew the concept of family live a less fulfilling life IMO.