Why can't they just do what their visa REQUIRES by law?
sounds like they block "known" fingerprinting scripts and call it a day.
In addition, I block most known advertizing/tracking domains at the DNS level (I run my own server, and use Hagezi's blacklists).
Finally, another suggestion would be to block all third party content by default using uBlock Origin and/or uMatrix. This will break a lot of websites, but automatically rules out most forms of tracking through things such as fonts hosted by Google, Adobe and others. I manually whitelist required third party domains (CDNs) for websites I frequently visit.
Firefox exposes a massive amount of identifiable information via canvas, audio device and feature detection methods. There's also active methods to detect private windows, use of the developer console and more.
Dead Comment
In other words, I'm being asked to buy a product, and the cheapest form of it is to basically pay almost $15k in a year to hedge against someone getting cancer or whatever, and actively incentivizes me to not use it[0].
There is no meaningful shopping around, there is no incentive for me to do anything other than continue not smoking, there's no accounting for where I live or my health.
I dunno what the solution is. I'm just glad that the ACA included health sharing co-ops as an exception. Been doing that for awhile now and have saved a lot of money. (And they'll give me a discount if I get my weight down a little more!)
[0]: Because even if you get a free wellness visit or whatever, it's really easy for them to drop in some random test that ends up getting billed. Had this happen with my kids a few times if memory serves.
Now it is a system that ONLY the unhealthy benefit from. Everyone else pays for extremely bad choices.
The US became less attractive for becoming an authoritarian state that is a threat to its own people because of people like RFK Jr. or ICE raids based on racial profiles.
The notion that this is new, or that it is a single side, is of course an attempt to paper over historical data which is readily accessible.
Authoritarian regimes tend to have no checks and balances, whereas the other two branches of government have both repeatedly restrained the executive this year, through both law and judicial rulings. They also tend to clamp down on free speech, which isn't happening (but is in Europe), or disarm the population (try owning a firearm in China or North Korea).