Readit News logoReadit News
pr0zac commented on Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according to YouTube   jeffgeerling.com/blog/202... · Posted by u/DavideNL
mardifoufs · 3 months ago
Mhmm, so would it be fine for a private platform not allowing say, Muslims on their website? Especially a platform as big as YouTube? I mean, it's essential to their rights to be able to do that, I guess?

Like I understand your point, but this argument is usually not actually useful. Especially since it's usually not coming from "free speech absolutist" types, so it always comes off as a bit disingenuous. Unless you are arguing for big corporations having an absolute right to free speech, which I would disagree with but would at least make the argument consistent.

pr0zac · 3 months ago
I don't think anyone would argue that would violate freedom of speech, however it would still be illegal as it would violate the civil rights act by discriminating based on religion. Theres more than one right involved in your hypothetical basically.
pr0zac commented on Developer sabotaged ex-employer with kill switch that activated when fired   theregister.com/2025/03/0... · Posted by u/defrost
ElFitz · 6 months ago
> but I think it's much worse, now, than it has ever been.

At some point, some US employers would hire armed private security companies like Pinkerton to break strikes, often leading to multiple deaths.

In other countries, the army would be sent to break prolonged strikes by shooting at strikers.

In other words, it has been way worse.

pr0zac · 6 months ago
> In other countries, the army would be sent to break prolonged strikes by shooting at strikers.

This happened in West Virginia as well: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain

pr0zac commented on CrowdStrike Update: Windows Bluescreen and Boot Loops   old.reddit.com/r/crowdstr... · Posted by u/BLKNSLVR
markus_zhang · a year ago
I don't understand why you were downvoted. I'm interested in what you said. When you mentioned offsec evasion class, is this what you mean? It seems pretty advanced.

https://www.offsec.com/courses/pen-300/

What kind of code should I read? Actually, let me ask this, what kind of code should I write first before diving into this kind of evasion technique? I feel I need to write some small Windows system software like duplicating Process Explorer, to get familiar with Win32 programming and Windows system programming, but I could be wrong?

I think I do have a study path, but it's full of gap. I work as a data engineer -- the kind that I wouldn't even bother to call myself engineer /s

pr0zac · a year ago
I know quite a few offensive security pros that are way better than I will ever be at breaking into systems and evading detections that can only barely program anything beyond simple python scripts.

It’s a great goal to eventually learn everything, but knowing the correct tools and techniques and how and when to use them most effectively are very different skillsets from discovering new vulnerabilities or writing new exploit code and you can start at any of them.

Compare for instance a physiologist, a gymnastics coach, and an Olympic gymnast. They all “know how the human body works” but in very different ways and who you’d go to for expertise depends on the context.

Similarly just start with whatever part you are most interested in. If you want to know the techniques and tools you can web search and find lots of details.

If you want to know how best to use them you should set up vulnerable machines (or find a relevant CTF) and practice. If you want to understand how they were discovered and how people find new ones you should read writeups from places like Project Zero that do that kind of research. If you’re interested in writing your own then yes you probably need to learn some system programming. If you enjoy the field you can expand your knowledge base.

pr0zac commented on How the Food Industry Pays Influencers to Shill Blueberries, Butter, and More   bonappetit.com/story/food... · Posted by u/helsinkiandrew
bigstrat2003 · a year ago
I'll have to see if I can find it at a store. I'm always down to improve my butter experience. I will say that I was very let down by Kerrygold. It's noticeably better if you are having just plain buttered toast, but otherwise I can't taste any difference between it and the normal butter one sees at the store.
pr0zac · a year ago
Found that to be the case with any butter really, when you cook with it or do anything that dilutes it, the flavor beyond "lipids" ends up lost quickly amongst the other flavors. We buy cheaper butter for stuff like frying eggs or to add to recipes that call for it and buy a smaller amount of really good stuff to put on (cooked) bread/steak/potatoes or other times where the flavor difference feels noticeable (also usually do unsalted for the normal, and salted for the high-grade). Note I said cheaper not cheap, I'd say like wine you shouldn't cook with butter you'd refuse on its own.
pr0zac commented on Fewer people are buying electric cars in the US   businessinsider.com/elect... · Posted by u/NN88
GrinningFool · 2 years ago
Looks like it starts at 28.5. Low-end IC cars (with more range and convenience) start at ~15-16k new in the US. (Kia, Nissan, etc).

That's a huge difference when that's the price range you're shopping, with added benefits of higher issue rates and less convenience when it comes to charging.

pr0zac · 2 years ago
While I'd argue anyone looking to spend under $20k on a car would be better suited going used/pre-owned instead of new, theres really not a price premium on new electric vehicles anymore.

The Chevy Bolt MSRP is $26,500[1] (not sure where you saw 28.5) but it qualifies for the $7500 rebate. In the past that was a tax write-off and you still had to pay sticker up front but it changed this year to be a credit the IRS gives the dealer at time of purchase so the price gets immediately knocked down to $19k.[2] Requires the purchaser be under the new income cap to qualify but that includes over 90% of people.

Theres only two new cars available in 2024 under $19k, the Nissan Versa and Mitsubishi Mirage. If we look at 2023 theres also the Kia Rio. All three are out of date cars with anemic engines (the Mirage literally makes 78hp) and 0-60 times of 10 seconds or more compared to 200hp and 6.8 seconds for the Bolt. None of the base models have Apple CarPlay or Android Auto unlike the Bolt. Same for safety features/creature comforts like lane assist and adaptive cruise control.

Otherwise the next cheapest new car available is the '23 Kia Forte which is a pretty fun car (and can reach highway speed before the heat death of the universe) which is actually in a similar tier to the Bolt and similarly priced at $19.5k.[3]

Theres definitely a lot of people who EVs don't work for logistically (myself included until only very recently), and yes you could buy one of three horrifying cars I would not force on my worst enemy for less, but manufacturers know they won't sell overpriced cars so the upfront cost of an EV aligns quite well nowadays with comparable ICE vehicles.

1. https://www.chevrolet.com/electric/bolt-ev

2. https://www.kbb.com/car-news/with-tax-credit-as-down-payment...

3. https://www.carfax.com/blog/cheapest-cars

pr0zac commented on Fewer people are buying electric cars in the US   businessinsider.com/elect... · Posted by u/NN88
aftbit · 2 years ago
Hi! I'm one of these people. All three of those conditions are true for me, and yet I don't own an EV. Why? Because it seems like the technology is going to be much much better and cheaper in 5 years or less, and I'd hate to drop a big ball of cash on a new EV today when I can probably get either a better new one or a cheaper used one in just a couple of years.
pr0zac · 2 years ago
I've been thinking about this same thing lately since I will soon fit those conditions as well and I think at least for me personally this year may be the best time to buy one.

While I agree the technology will be better and cheaper 5 years from now that will always be the case and it seems like we are past the point of exponential improvements in short periods of time. Current EVs meet or exceed my needs regarding range, reliability, and performance so I don't have a quantitative goalpost that needs to be reached anymore.

What is really pushing me over the line though is changes to the relevant financial incentives. The new income caps mean I still qualify for the $7,500 tax rebate because I took a bunch of time off work in 2023 but will no longer be eligible after this year. I can't see the technology improving so much in the next few years it outweighs that discount combined with not having to wait.

pr0zac commented on Fewer people are buying electric cars in the US   businessinsider.com/elect... · Posted by u/NN88
serial_dev · 2 years ago
"It only takes 5x longer to charge at some specific charging stations that may or may not be conveniently located for your trip, I don't know what's the big deal"

I can see how EV cars are good options for people who live in the city and only go grocery shopping, but for people who have family scattered around the country / continent with young children or babies, it sounds extremely inconvenient.

pr0zac · 2 years ago
Interesting that you and I evaluated who EVs are good options for completely differently. I've considered getting one for many years but only felt doing so made sense now that I'm moving out of the city to the country in a few weeks.

It never made sense before because I didn't have anywhere to plug an EV in nor did I want the hassle of street parking two vehicles. I have a 4x4 for offroading, mountain biking, and other weekend trips but getting around town on bike/foot/transit was faster day to day.

Now that I have a house and land getting an EV as a daily driver for the 20 to 100 mile round trips I take into town/the city actually makes sense since I have plenty of space to keep multiple cars, can install the necessary charging (and solar) equipment, and don't want to die riding my bicycle on unlit country roads.

u/pr0zac

KarmaCake day2104March 2, 2010View Original