Working for a F500 company, I have tried to use budget surplus to reward open source projects we use. Management looked at me like I had grown an additional head.
"We've never heard of that happening, so no."
Working for a F500 company, I have tried to use budget surplus to reward open source projects we use. Management looked at me like I had grown an additional head.
"We've never heard of that happening, so no."
Now, I don't actually believe this, because that puts Perl way ahead of Rust (currently at #18). So the big thing I'm taking away from this little research post is that I no longer trust the Tiobe index. Too bad - it felt pretty reliable for a long time.
We thought that it would take a year or two, not decades.
Also, the intent was to have a Perl 5 compatibility mode.
Navy Contract Law (U.S. Bureau Naval Personnel) ix. 212/2 -- "This type of clause has proved so valuable that it is presently standard ‘boilerplate’ not only in shipbuilding contracts but also in almost every kind of contract."
The first reference in the OED for it being used w/r/t computer stuff is 1990:
L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz Programming Perl vii. 379 -- "Like mus itself, man2mus is not 100% effective, but can save you a lot of time producing the initial boilerplate."
I used a machine with a 9-year-old distro on it for a few months, and all my scripts ran without issue, and I have high confidence that they will continue to run for years down the road without my having to adjust them for breaking changes in the language runtime, which is more than I can say for most other stacks I've used.
Furthermore, ALL the code examples I can google up will work without me having to check if they're for the right version of Perl, because it has near-perfect backwards compatibility going back all the way to 5.000 from 1994.
About the only other thing with a comparable level of stability has been HTML/JS/CSS, which gets a lot of new features all the time, but, for the most part, if I use only minimal features, remains usable for years without modification.
Which features do you see as esoteric?
Once a little boy, old man and their donkey traveling on feet.
First passerby "What morons, they have donkey and no one is riding on it. So boy sits on donkey.
Second passerby "Look, what a shame, young lad sitting on donkey and poor old man is forced to walk on feet. So they swap.
Third passerby "Wow, this grownup adult is riding donkey while little kid is walks in hot sun. So they both sit on donkey.
Fourth passerby "Amazing, just amazing, two able bodied people riding on this poor animal. Can't they at least take turns like a decent human."