The people deciding how much OpenAI is worth would probably struggle to run first-time setup on an iPad.
Great Engineer + AI = Great Engineer++ (Where a great engineer isn't just someone who is a great coder, they also are a great communicator & collaborator, and love to learn)
Good Engineer + AI = Good Engineer
OK Engineer + AI = Mediocre Engineer
Thats the reason for high valuation of AI companies.
I never seen such invertment round. aren't you supposed to stop at C or D? .. or at least at some point?
If anyone can _legitimately_ justify this, please do, I'd love to hear it.
And don't go "booohooo at scale" because I work at scale and am 100% not sure what is the problem this is solving that can't just be solved with a simpler solution.
Also this isn't "Netflix scale", Tudum is way less popular.
All four speakers ran the exact same slide deck with a different intro slide. All four speakers claimed the same responsibility for the same part of the architecture.
I was livid. I also stopped attending talks in person entirely because of this, outside of smaller more focused events.
As much as this website could be very trafficked I have the feeling they are overcomplicating their infra, for little gains. Or at least, I wouldn't expect to end having an article about.