Readit News logoReadit News
nuccy commented on James Webb Space Telescope reveals that most galaxies rotate clockwise   smithsonianmag.com/smart-... · Posted by u/instagraham
smeej · 5 months ago
This is exactly the dumb question I came here to ask. So now I wait with you for a less dumb person to reply.

My clock certainly seems to tick in the opposite direction when I look at it from behind.

nuccy · 5 months ago
Answering to your and original question above: there are no poles (or axes of rotation) in the Universe. On large scales (think distances to include thousands and millions of galaxies each with billions of stars with even more planets) the Universe is uniform - isotropic and homogeneous [1]. It is expanding with acceleration in all direction in each and every point of its space, so there is no preferred direction thus in average we should have 50% of clockwise and 50% of counter-clockwise galaxies since orientation of those should also be absolutely random in average, unless something when the Universe was being created or evolving affected that balance.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

Deleted Comment

nuccy commented on NASA to launch space observatory that will map 450M galaxies   nbcnews.com/science/space... · Posted by u/gmays
DiogenesKynikos · 6 months ago
Astronomy has been in a golden age for the last 35 years, based on:

1. Digital cameras, and the computers to analyze images.

2. Space telescopes (Hubble Space Telescope, the first large space telescope, only launched in 1990).

3. The building of massive ground-based telescopes. Before 1990, the largest telescope had a mirror diameter of 6 meters. Now, multiple 30-meter telescopes are under construction. Collecting power goes with the square of the diameter, so this is an increase of 25 times in collecting power!

4. Very recently, the development of gravitational-wave interferometers, which allow astronomers to observe a totally new type of radiation.

nuccy · 6 months ago
To add to the list (the order is arbitrary):

5. Advances in the multi-messenger observations, where apart of photons and gravitational waves, astronomers can detects also neutrinos with specialized neutrino detectors, e.g.: IceCube [a], though there are many more of those [b].

6. Advances in very-long-baseline interferometry [c] using a globe-sized array of radio-telescopes, like Event Horizon Telescope [d]

[a] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IceCube_Neutrino_Observatory

[b] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_detector or here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_neutrino_experiments

[c] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-long-baseline_interferome...

[d] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_Horizon_Telescope

nuccy commented on Walt Disney's MultiPlane Camera (Filmed Feb. 13, 1957) [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=3YIR3... · Posted by u/cachehit
aweiland · 6 months ago
I wonder when and why they stopped making films like these. I've been enjoying watching Behind the Attraction and The Imagineering Story on Disney+ with my kids. They are full of these old films of Walt going over their ideas and explaining the things they are and have built. It's a shame that stopped.
nuccy · 6 months ago
Some technologies have been lost, even though they were superior to what is available today. Take, for example, the old “green/blue screen” technique using sodium vapor lamps, used by Walt Disney in film production in the pre-digital era: https://youtu.be/UQuIVsNzqDk (12 minutes long, but totally worth it).
nuccy commented on Athena spacecraft declared dead after toppling over on moon   theguardian.com/science/2... · Posted by u/pseudolus
nuccy · 6 months ago
Generally I agree, but Moon is not a bad place for solar panels if a spacecraft has no contingencies and is able to harvest energy during Moon's day and store it in batteries to be used over the night. The sufficient power can be generated by a solar panel of the size (or even smaller) of the spacecraft itself. The other story is for missions like Juno [1] or Europa Clipper [2] which use solar panels near Jupiter - instead of centering develoment and mass budget around payload most of the spacecraft is an enourmously sized solar array. Juno panels generate 14kW on Earth orbit and only 500W near Jupiter [1].

1. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-juno-spacecraft-breaks-s...

2. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/europa-clipper/nasas-europa-cl...

nuccy · 6 months ago
Another non-obvious problem is that RTGs, as any other thermal machines, need a gradient of temperature to work, i.e. to generate electrical power there should be hot (nuclear material) and cold (radiators) side. On interplanetary spacecraft (Voyager, New horizons) Sun is in a predictable (and stable) direction so RTG's radiators can be put in a permanent shadow of the spacecraft. On the Moon the sun is moving, and there is no atmosphere (unlike on Mars where RTGs are used), so on a small spacecraft RTG will need to be dug deep into the regolith which is absoluteky non-trivial since just landing straight sometimes is a problem.

There are always tradeoffs, it is almost never "why don't they just" case in spacecraft development.

nuccy commented on Athena spacecraft declared dead after toppling over on moon   theguardian.com/science/2... · Posted by u/pseudolus
astar1 · 6 months ago
These 2 failures could have been easily avoidable both times.

I really wish there was a push in the US government to create and stockpile plutonium-238 and ensure it's readily available, subsidized, and offered for all US probes/rovers/other scientific instruments in space (whether it be for NASA's use who currently has to ration because of how little they have left, or for private use after approval).

Like, why aren't all of space scientific instruments RTG powered like voyager 1 which is still providing useful scientific data 47+ years later. Think about all of the lost scientific insights over the past few decades because either NASA (because of a low stockpile) or private companies like intuitive (from their 2 failures) end up choosing solar panels for their source of power with no other alternative.

Besides the fact that solar panels can fail if they aren't pointed a certain way, they usually offer far less power, and are subject to radiation, micro meteor, or dust damage. All of these are the main reason why these instruments tend to have a far shorter lifespan than voyager 1.

nuccy · 6 months ago
Generally I agree, but Moon is not a bad place for solar panels if a spacecraft has no contingencies and is able to harvest energy during Moon's day and store it in batteries to be used over the night. The sufficient power can be generated by a solar panel of the size (or even smaller) of the spacecraft itself. The other story is for missions like Juno [1] or Europa Clipper [2] which use solar panels near Jupiter - instead of centering develoment and mass budget around payload most of the spacecraft is an enourmously sized solar array. Juno panels generate 14kW on Earth orbit and only 500W near Jupiter [1].

1. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-juno-spacecraft-breaks-s...

2. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/europa-clipper/nasas-europa-cl...

nuccy commented on U.S. pauses all military aid to Ukraine   wsj.com/politics/national... · Posted by u/ZeroCool2u
nuccy · 6 months ago
Thus two messages for every other country:

1. Make nukes, never give up on those regardless of what assurances of safety you get

2. If you are bigger and stronger - you are right, do whatever you want, international laws and rules do not matter any more

Lets see where all this will bring the world to in the next 10 years or a generation.

Deleted Comment

nuccy commented on Sri Lanka scrambles to restore power after monkey causes islandwide outage   reuters.com/world/asia-pa... · Posted by u/abe94
BLKNSLVR · 7 months ago
Unfortunately it's looks as if Cyber Squirrel 1* hasn't been updated since 2019.

This disruption would be one of the more successful operations.

*https://cybersquirrel1.com/

nuccy · 7 months ago
The operations are international and are carried out not only by squirrels, weasels (some say martens) are also involved. One of those (unlikely unintentionally) had shutdown the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in 2016:

1. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36173247

nuccy commented on Turn any bicycle electric   dhruvvidyut.co.in/... · Posted by u/samdung
MattSayar · 7 months ago
I love everything about the demo video on the homepage. It's always fun to see a creator beat up their product and see it withstand the abuse.

As far as "any bike can be an ebike" I'm surprised that Hilltoppers[0] haven't gained more traction over the years. You just pop off your current bike's front wheel and install theirs.

[0] https://hilltopperbikes.com/product-category/electric-bike-k...

nuccy · 7 months ago
The video is indeed very nice, it shows few things [1] not mentioned on the website:

- the chain is routed through the add-on device, so it should be longer than usual

- the pedals don't rotate when the chain and the wheel do, so there is a custom pedal hub with a ratchet mechanism

1. https://youtube.com/watch?v=SFsnS0Yb1Bs&t=83s

u/nuccy

KarmaCake day1204June 3, 2015View Original