Readit News logoReadit News
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
michaelmcdonald · 2 years ago
I believe the point is that Op doesn't _want_ to chat. I believe the originally point is you should be up front and _clear_ with your pricing rather than trying to force a conversation.
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Yep, I get it. Working on a self-serve pricing calculator. Reality is that enterprise convos do make sense at sufficient scale. If it does here, our inbox is open!
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
nunodonato · 2 years ago
as cheap as ArcGIS, which is vastly superior. But kudos to this project
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Out of curiosity, why do you think it's vastly superior?
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
amluto · 2 years ago
The example map of New York on the linked page has rather odd labeled places and street names. At the default zoom, it’s marked up as if New York, Hoboken, Weehawken, etc are literal points marked by tiny circles. This is particularly silly in the New York area, which is a continuous gridded metropolitan area.

Then, when zooming in, you have to zoom very very far in before street names show up. This makes a map zoomed slightly less far in mostly useless, because you can’t tell where you are. I realize that people mostly don’t navigate by map any more, but if you are literally selling map tiles, presumably mostly not tied to the end user’s GPS, then whoever is looking at the map would like to know where they’re looking. For example, in Manhattan, the actual useful coordinates are the cross-streets, and the map is not very helpful without the street names.

nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Appreciate the feedback. We're working on showing the right level of detail at different zoom levels for the different map styles. cc @kocheez75
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
Doctor_Fegg · 2 years ago
There’s no attribution that I can see on the second embedded map on the page (on mobile). A honking great Radar logo, but no OSM attribution.

This trend of “our branding takes priority over the required attribution for the free map data we’re using, but hey, they’re a little nonprofit so can’t afford to sue us” really ticks me off. Mapbox started it as a calculated move, and since then others have followed claiming it’s “the standard”.

But in this case I’ll assume good faith for now and hope it’s fixed. A simple “© OSM” would be fine.

nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Should be showing a collapsible ⓘ button on very small screens. We'll take a look and fix.
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
eliaspro · 2 years ago
You might also want to check out https://felt.com/ (also OSM-based).
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
We are big fans of Felt!
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
edrxty · 2 years ago
Was hoping for some sort of interesting synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mapping service like Capella Space. Instead got more adtech APIs :/

Why did they name themselves "Radar"?

nickpatrick · 2 years ago
As someone who used to work at an ad tech company, I can tell you that we're very much not an ad tech company. In fact, we set out to build the opposite. More here: https://radar.com/blog/our-commitment-to-privacy

Short, easy-to-spell name that suggests location. It's worked out pretty well for us, and we got the dot com!

nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
JamesBrooks · 2 years ago
I came to write exactly this comment, specifically I wanted to check what the pricing for forward geocoding was, as I've got a very significant monthly Google Maps bill for geocoding and if Radar gives results which are 95% as good as Google's at a cheaper price then I'd be jumping
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Would love to chat. Worth considering best solution given tradeoffs: Cost, coverage, customization options, enterprise-readiness
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
johncalvinyoung · 2 years ago
What's the terms on your forward geocoding? Many providers have terms that require live lookup of address->latlong, no caching permitted. My client's use case has long-lived addresses that may need to be mapped many times, and currently we're paying for one of the only geocoding services that permits us to persist the coordinates involved.
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Our standard policy is that you can cache responses for up to 30 days: https://radar.com/documentation/maps/geocoding#caching
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
hackernewds · 2 years ago
How can you afford to be 10x cheaper? Google being overkill?
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
You can charge a lot when you're #1.
nickpatrick commented on Radar Maps Platform   radar.com/blog/introducin... · Posted by u/aleyan
pcl · 2 years ago
How would you say you measure up in Europe? How about compared to Apple?
nickpatrick · 2 years ago
Still pretty good in Europe, but more of a gap. International coverage will be a priority in 2024.

u/nickpatrick

KarmaCake day96July 4, 2010
About
http://www.nicholasjohnpatrick.com https://radar.com
View Original