Deleted Comment
Using UUID here wouldn’t help here because you don’t want different identifiers for the same content. Time-based UUID versions would negate the point of ETag, and otherwise if you use UUIDv8 and simply put a hash value in there, all you’re doing is reducing the bit depth of the hash and changing its formatting, for limited benefit.
Bonus: we self-selected for people who don’t like to pair. We paired 100% of the time.
Then I look at the username and it’s my classmate from down the hall in the same dorm.
And I’m pretty sure I actually did end up in a beach house with them at some point.
If you don’t like the name, launch your own CentOS replacement. There’s no better time than now. If there’s one thing this project does not need right now, it’s armchair marketing experts.
If you do care about a viable CentOS replacement, do something. Contribute code, money or expertise. The last thing any new and vulnerable project needs is another “idea guy” or a new logo.
I mean, it’s Linux.