Readit News logoReadit News
mseebach commented on How to Pay Remote Employees   fredperrotta.com/pay-remo... · Posted by u/bradleybuda
mseebach · 8 years ago
> Wire transfer fees are a set amount, usually around $40, not a percentage of the total amount transferred. You can do the math to figure out at what dollar threshold sending wire transfers through your bank becomes cheaper than using Transferwise.

Absolutely do the math, but keep in mind that fees are not the only fees when doing FX: few banks will use the spot FX rate for wire transfers, they'll typically add a spread of about 3%.

mseebach commented on What the Airline Knows About the Guy in Seat 14C   wsj.com/articles/what-the... · Posted by u/petethomas
toomanybeersies · 8 years ago
I don't like strangers using my name. Police do that, debt collectors do that. Flight attendants and waiters should not do that.

I think it's an information asymmetry thing. I don't like it when people know more about me than the other way round, or at least don't like it when they make it obvious.

And specifically with birthdays. I'd be pretty annoyed if flight attendants started wishing me happy birthday, I hate it when people do that. I like to keep my birthday a private event. I barely tolerate work buying me a cake and singing happy birthday, and that's just because I get cake and everyone else in the office enjoys the whole thing.

mseebach · 8 years ago
This has happened very rarely to me, but when it has, the head purser would usually be carrying the manifest or an iPad and clearly referencing it. That takes the creepiness out of it. It's a nice, but ultimately not terribly important, touch that they make a bit of an effort to personalise the greeting.

On one or two occasions (flying to a short stay at an outstation, and catching the same crew on the return), the attendant clearly recognised me, and made a point of saying hello, welcome back (not by name though, that would have been creepy). That's rare, and not really to be expected, though.

mseebach commented on “It’s Easier To Ask Forgiveness Than To Get Permission”   quoteinvestigator.com/201... · Posted by u/objections
kartan · 8 years ago
I have seen this abused. A team member does whatever she thinks is best, and the rest now have to tag along because to communicate to all stakeholders that it was not a team decision and needs to be revisited is too costly.

That can be seen by some management as "getting things done". And quite often that person feels vindicated when her solution works.

But that person is not able to realize the cost of the mistrust of the team and detachment of the job nor to think about the possibility that the other solution not only have worked, but it will have been way better.

At my job, I have to arbitrate between team members and teams. I will flag anyone that decides to "ask for forgiveness instead of permission" and notify their manager. I don't like to work with people that think that they are so good that don't need to present their arguments like the rest.

So when going for forgiveness instead of permission, it is wise to think:

a) If your way is so good, you should be able to get what you want with arguments.

b) If you force everyone else to follow your way without their consent, you are not a leader you are just abusing the system.

c) That it works does not mean that was the best option.

d) That other people can also have done the same does not mean that they are worse than you, it may be that they see a bigger picture that you can't see.

It is still possible to go for it. But you need to be accountable for the consequences.

mseebach · 8 years ago
I think there are two nuances missing here: First, it's easier to ask forgiveness -- this is a descriptive statement, it doesn't say better. Second, this is predicated on getting forgiveness. If what you do isn't relatively easy to forgive, you lose a lot, eg. getting fired or otherwise formally sanctioned. It's certainly neither easier, nor better.

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

mseebach commented on Amazon's Alexa now at Marriott hotels   uk.reuters.com/article/uk... · Posted by u/Bhilai
untog · 8 years ago
There's something a little sad about this. Unlike at home, hotels are a place where you already have a voice assistant - the concierge, that'll give you restaurant recommendations, pick up your laundry and call a cab for you. And do a much better job than any automated voice assistant will do. But I don't doubt for a second that this will eventually be paired with a strong rollback of real humans manning phone lines.

Sigh.

mseebach · 8 years ago
There's already a very easy and commonly deployed way to save on a concierge: don't have one.
mseebach commented on Amazon's Alexa now at Marriott hotels   uk.reuters.com/article/uk... · Posted by u/Bhilai
metajack · 8 years ago
A few hotels already have tablets pointing cameras at the room (including a recent Marriott I stayed at). This just adds more crap I have to unplug or disable. Lovely.

I can't wait until we all find out these things have all been systematically rooted and collecting blackmail on folks.

It's one thing to trust Amazon or Google, but now you also have to trust the hotel and its staff, the physical security of the device, and all the previous guests of the room.

mseebach · 8 years ago
> It's one thing to trust Amazon or Google, but now you also have to trust the hotel and its staff, the physical security of the device, and all the previous guests of the room.

You already had to do the physical trust thing. These devices are a new challenge because they could be remotely compromised.

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

Loading parent story...

Loading comment...

u/mseebach

KarmaCake day17895July 29, 2008
About
mail@martinseebach.dk

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mseebach; my proof: https://keybase.io/mseebach/sigs/MrSYs4X-dOTqSlkgrvBHi2Z5U9weDt0idp7AFsT2vmI ]

View Original