I assume you've never been there. 一ノ倉沢 is really impressive and dangerous.
I assume you've never been there. 一ノ倉沢 is really impressive and dangerous.
Number of UTF-8 code units (17 in this case) Number of UTF-16 code units (7 in this case) Number of UTF-32 code units or Unicode scalar values (5 in this case) Number of extended grapheme clusters (1 in this case)
We would not have this problem if we all agree to return number of bytes instead.
Edit: My mistake. There would still be inconsistency between different encoding. My point is, if we all decided to report number of bytes that string used instead number of printable characters, we would not have the inconsistency between languages.
I don't understand. It depends on the encoding isn't it?
The thing is that, equality is the difficult problem. "equals" in JVM languages has a lot of problems. Dynamic languages are much more horrible in this aspect. JavaScript `==` is much worse than Java. Python is guilty too in my view, for using `__eq__` method. The only language I know which solves the problem correctly is Haskell. (Or, `Eq` in Cats)
However Java has advantages too: the IDE support was miles better than Scala, build times were shorter, most frameworks were more mature and better supported and the language itself was much more stable.
TLDR: don't use XML.
I'd say Java is a great production language, mostly because it's so simple that I don't need to "learn" it (when you know better than using madness like `==` or Serializable).
The end result? Non-mainstream languages don't get much easier to get into because average Joe isn't already proficient in them to catch AI's bugs.
People often forget the bitter lesson of machine learning which plagues transformer models as well.
https://4travel.jp/travelogue/11828856
I've only taken the tourist route of Tanigawa-dake. Those photos are scary enough that I won't try Ichinokura.