With a target of 20% accuracy, it won't make much difference, but I think that symmetrical error bounds are appropriate in this case - the factor by which the answer is wrong. so 2 times too big, is as good as 2 times too small.
other countries would be wise to adopt that, but there is zero chance of that happening.
Until they can't import food and can't feed their people
So Helsinki city center is at 21km/h travel speeds, metro area at 31km/h. A speed limit of 30 km/h doesn't really affect these travel times much.
I can't find 2023 data to compare, however by other data on the net these are very common average speeds for any city in Europe even those with plenty of 50 km/h speed limits.
If more people take up public transport, bikes or scooters in fear of an average travel speed reduction of 1-2 km/h - that is a total win for everyone involved including drivers.
In my experience (on UK roads) this critical speed is around 17 MPH - but it might be a little different elsewhere.
I'm becoming somewhat (although not completely) cynical in a "devil is in the details" kinda way.
It seems we see a lot of hype which either fizzles out, or never seems to make it all the way.
This one us at the pilot plant stage, so at least made it out the lab. I hope it makes it all the way to full size production.
Research is akin to gambling. You cannot predict which bets will pay off, but if you can win on average, it's worth betting as many times as you can afford.
Today we juggle with ~15+Wh batteries (the "capacitor") and 30+W fast chargers (the "power source") and still need better.
it is predictable and reliable, so has significant advantages over wind.
A guaranteed minimum power generation would presumably be very useful.