Readit News logoReadit News
masklinn commented on US attack on renewables will lead to power crunch that spikes electricity prices   cnbc.com/2025/08/24/solar... · Posted by u/rntn
seszett · 32 minutes ago
Belgium didn't phase out nuclear. They decided that someone in the future would handle the closure of the nuclear plants, and when the time came and no replacement plant had been built, we just kept the nuclear plants running.
masklinn · 24 minutes ago
Belgium legislated the phase out of nuclear in 2003 due 2025, opting to neither replace nor postpone closure of nor refurbish its at the time 7 reactors as their lifetimes ran out.

Then it had to postpone the closure of at least two reactors following the second invasion of Ukraine, and this year officially dropped the phaseout and opened the door for new builds (unlikely as they are).

masklinn commented on US attack on renewables will lead to power crunch that spikes electricity prices   cnbc.com/2025/08/24/solar... · Posted by u/rntn
seanmcdirmid · 41 minutes ago
Did France really phase out nuclear, or do you mean the rest of Europe?
masklinn · 36 minutes ago
Mostly Germany, Belgium as well, possibly a few others.

France did shut down superphenix for completely ideological reasons tho.

Also stopped investing in nuclear but that was not really ideological (the nuclear buildup originated in something of a misprediction, and sadly the country didn’t really capitalise on it).

masklinn commented on US attack on renewables will lead to power crunch that spikes electricity prices   cnbc.com/2025/08/24/solar... · Posted by u/rntn
picafrost · an hour ago
We tried ideology driven energy policy in Europe and it hasn't gone well. We phased out nuclear power plants (because nuclear = bad) while doubling down on Russian gas dependency (because trade = peace). Clearly this has gone poorly and it will take Europe a decade to strengthen its energy sovereignty again.

There are good reasons to question renewable energy: the cost picture doesn't make sense right now, it has intermittency problems, etc. But killing renewable projects because, uh, farming or whatever?, particularly at a time when the demand for energy is growing faster than ever, seems short sighted at best.

masklinn · an hour ago
Killing solar because “farming” is an unfathomable level of mind-bogglingly nonsensical.

Of course making sense does not in any way matter to this administration, and Trump hates wind turbines because of his dumb golf course, but still…

masklinn commented on Texas Instruments’ new plants where Apple will make iPhone chips   cnbc.com/2025/08/22/apple... · Posted by u/giuliomagnifico
blks · 5 hours ago
Taxes and labour laws/no unions
masklinn · 4 hours ago
Also limited to no environmental regulations and very… accommodating… administrations.
masklinn commented on What if every city had a London Overground?   dwell.com/article/what-if... · Posted by u/edward
asdff · 7 hours ago
There is a huge difference between light rail and heavy rail in terms of surface noise I find. Light rail on modern track is pretty quiet.
masklinn · 7 hours ago
When light rail can go through every 2 minutes during peak hours, the difference is largely academic.
masklinn commented on What if every city had a London Overground?   dwell.com/article/what-if... · Posted by u/edward
masklinn · 10 hours ago
> in New York and Chicago, Paris and Berlin, Tokyo and Beijing, people are being whisked through a network of tunnels, deep below the bustling city.

Paris’ RER is a mostly aboveground suburban rail network, it’s only underground when it reaches the city center. And it’s far from unique, that’s a common feature of commuter rail.

And while the metro is mostly underground, about 20km (out of 245) is aboveground.

masklinn commented on XSLT removal will break multiple government and regulatory sites   github.com/whatwg/html/is... · Posted by u/colejohnson66
pas · 2 days ago
but why priviligize XML? there's WASM and sites can have any kinds of codecs they want.

unfortunately(?) modern browsers are turning more into these sandbox and state managers with a few lower-level rendering engines bolted together (JS driving the DOM, plus CSS and SVG and audio and video and font and various image codecs and ...)

and if people want to copy the raw data URL the site can show them, plus HTTP provides the Accept and other headers for content negotiation so in theory the URL can be the same.

masklinn · a day ago
> but why priviligize XML?

Because it was privileged at the start and now it’s been a working feature you could rely on for a generation.

> there's WASM and sites can have any kinds of codecs they want.

Can’t js your way into the browser opening an xml document and automatically applying the stylesheet as far as I know.

masklinn commented on XSLT removal will break multiple government and regulatory sites   github.com/whatwg/html/is... · Posted by u/colejohnson66
troupo · 2 days ago
> Simple: xslt is a giant attack surface entirely in C, and no browser maintainer cares to expend resources on maintaining that

And yet they have no qualms shoving huge attack surfaces in the form of WebUSB, WebSerial, WebMIDI, WebTransport, WebBluetooth, WebKitchenSink, most of which have as much usage as XSLT: https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity... or https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity...

masklinn · a day ago
The critical part is “cares to expend resources”. Google really wants these communication protocols for whatever reason and is happy to support them, but clearly does not care about Xslt.
masklinn commented on XSLT removal will break multiple government and regulatory sites   github.com/whatwg/html/is... · Posted by u/colejohnson66
mmastrac · 2 days ago
It really should just be compiled to WASM and used with some sort of DOM bridge.
masklinn · 2 days ago
The big sticking point is not the JS access, that’s mildly easy to implement.

It’s that currently you can open an XML file (including feeds) with an associated stylesheet and the stylesheet gets applied, which can be used to render an HTML document on the client side from an xml source like a feed.

masklinn commented on XSLT removal will break multiple government and regulatory sites   github.com/whatwg/html/is... · Posted by u/colejohnson66
cookiengineer · 2 days ago
I don't understand how WHATWG decides to remove XSLT, contradicting the 30+ years of never break the web doctrine... And simultaneously doesn't want to fix the typeof null specification bug because of, wait for it, Microsoft Exchange 2003 relying on that.

This makes absolutely no sense.

We could've had such a nice language. The efforts for a cleaner language and web platform API were there, but doctrine always said no because of legacy and people have moved on to alternatives now.

masklinn · 2 days ago
Simple: xslt is a giant attack surface entirely in C, and no browser maintainer cares to expend resources on maintaining that (pretty sure every browser uses libxslt).

u/masklinn

KarmaCake day67018April 25, 2009View Original