I've been and iOS developer for a long time. I can tell you from experience that everyone does this. I have never worked for anyone who didn't ask for their app to include some combination of Facebook, Google, Flurry, AppCenter, Segment, Intercom, Parse, or whatever other random analytics framework the PM happens to be infatuated with.
Getting mad at Zoom for using the Facebook SDK is missing the point. They and a million others are always going to be doing this. Get mad at Apple for not letting you wireshark your own iPhone. Or having no way to package open source software where you can actually see what's running. As long as you're running binary blobs that can make whatever network connections they please, people are going to take your data and send it to places you don't know about.
Yeah maybe you can pass laws about it. But is that really a great solution? Who audits that? How do you determine what's legal and what's not? We should be pushing for a platform that makes it obvious what the software you're running is up to. The random pitchfork crusade against whatever company happens to catch a bad news cycle just isn't going to get us anywhere.
So Zoom is basically lying here
Come on, the developers who takes the responsibility to use the SDK were aware of it, ok maybe the CEO of Zoom or the market guy was not but the tech team is. They are not stupid.
You should have just apologise and assume your fault, that would be the courageous position, not denying it.
Tbh I am ok with Zoom sending my data to FB (I mean, in my case I've insta/messenger anyway) but not ok for Zoom taking everyone as naïve people with this lying statement.
I can't see why Zoom can't come out with a statement regarding why they are collecting all of this sensitive data.
Big corporations might be sharing stuff unwittingly with people that they don't want to share it with.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1585521/000119312519...
Top of page 21 in their SEC filing:
"In addition, we have a high concentration of research and development personnel in China, which could expose us to market scrutiny regarding the integrity of our solution or data security features. Any security compromise in our industry, whether actual or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, negatively affect our ability to attract new customers and hosts, cause existing customers to elect not to renew their subscriptions or subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other action or liability, which could harm our business."
Yeah some companies are behind the curve (not blaming you).
Zoom is getting very popular
"Top of page 21- In addition, we have a high concentration of research and development personnel in China, which could expose us to market scrutiny regarding the integrity of our solution or data security features. Any security compromise in our industry, whether actual or perceived, could harm our reputation, erode confidence in the effectiveness of our security measures, negatively affect our ability to attract new customers and hosts, cause existing customers to elect not to renew their subscriptions or subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other action or liability, which could harm our business."
The consequence of getting on a school bus can be life or death. The consequence of eating a peanut butter sandwich can be life or death.
If you’re a medical professional or psychiatrist, maybe you shouldn’t use zoom due it’s privacy record. But if you’re teaching a lecture on linked lists to your class of 30 kids, death via persecution should probably be very low on your considerations when choosing video conference tech.
Zoom, Facebook, Microsoft, and Google could all learn a thing or two from Apple with regard to privacy policy.
Do the students not care?
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/26/zoom-key-profit-driver-ahead...
Look at the top of page 21 of their sec submission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1585521/000119312519...
Mistake? whoops