Your area might be different, of course.
If the seller's agent is comfortable acting as the intermediary, and recognizing the limits of conflict of interest, then it's in their best interest to keep all of the 6% commission instead of giving half of it to the buyer's agent.
For example, if the writers get what they wanted, it means Hollywood has little motivation to put its political might behind getting AI work recognized as copyrightable. The agreement may also include guidelines regarding when and how a writer's work can be used in training new AI models that would certainly have ramifications outside of Hollywood.
I'm torn on the AI/copyright issue. On the one hand, for actors, having your image and likeness digitally reproduced in perpetuity without compensation goes against the very profession of acting.
On the other hand, the act of writing is a more interesting gray area to me. There's a different between physical property and intellectual property. If a machine can learn better than a human and put out compelling content, I'm conflicted as to how restricting that helps us progress as a society (just like I'm conflicted as to how allowing it helps us progress as a society).
So many gray areas. I'm just glad a tentative agreement has been struck, and hopefully it's equitable and forward-looking for all sides.
Almost all the people on this forum are in the target market for the Pro. The standard iPhone is not built for us, nor will most of its users have a problem with 480Mbps-over-wire transfer speeds.
This translates to "more YT videos made by our content-creators", right? Searching for "macbook pro m2 reviews" gives me 5 YT videos at the top, all repeating the same stuff over and over again and (no offense) made by people who aren't really experts. Or are they?
(/s, if it wasn't blatantly obvious.)
We wrote up a brief FAQ on the topic of snippet security here: https://textexpander.com/learn/accounts/security/how-textexp...
…and you can see our general security practices info here (including that we have a SOC 2 security certification): https://textexpander.com/security
In the healthcare space, we often see practitioners using fill-in snippets to input patient information or notes into an EHR or other system while keeping a standard format to improve searchability. In the interest of security, personally-identifiable info (PII) entered into a fill-in snippet is ephemeral, and remains on the user's local machine. You can learn more about fill-ins here: https://textexpander.com/learn/using/snippets/advanced-snipp...
Please feel free to drop me a note with any further Q's - happy to help.
whose lyrics aren't ironic (they're examples of unfortunate situations), thus having a song about irony - that isn't actually ironic (in its lyrics)
thus making it the best ironic song ever
Aside from that, the entire song is filled with non-ironic scenarios, yep. Agreed: the most unintentionally ironic song ever.
This brought up a fun thought exercise for me. Pretty sure that Y Combinator would argue that giving away 7% of one's company for access to intangible (but beneficial) things like funding, advisors, etc, is completely worth it for a company. Pretty sure that they also fund companies that pay salespeople fairly significant commissions on sales.
Interesting to see them argue that asking a company to give up 30% "commission" on revenue for access to a large market stifles competition and innovation.
Is Y Combinator's forcing companies to give up 7% of their companies for access to advisors and funding stifling innovation and competition? (Spoiler: I don't think so. I think both Y Combinator and apple should be able to capitalize on the access they provide.)