Meh Also 10 mb of ram are hard to come by on mcus
Deleted Comment
So what's Google to even do?
* They could burn money and keep the offering afloat to "prove" they are serious (seems to be the case with Stadia).
* They can pivot/transition the offering (see Google Glass).
* Or they can use new offerings for R&D (and in some cases, like that of Stadia, be paid for that R&D), and then fold that technology/data somewhere else (see Wave) - this seems like the path most taken.
If we remember Google's core competencies, the revolving door of offerings as feeder into their larger services makes sense on paper, but I do agree that it's hurting consumer confidence and there is a hidden cost to that.
How you balance this equation is the hard part that takes effort and deep thinking and the subject to much discussion in many fields of philosophy.
Being a maximalist is the road to stupid dogmatic behaviour. The path to radical extremism.
Why do you consider "lawful" as the only measure of "good"?
And some level of stupidity, either natural or appearing with age, qualifies people to lose their right to be stupid, ie. conservatorship. Unfortunately it is a very heavy legal process of a sledgehammer when i think in many cases it should be a surgeon knife.
He said, no, he knew it was real because they gave him the phone number for a bank and he called and the man on the other end confirmed it was real.
I implored him not to send any more money, but he continued to take out a postal money order for a few hundred dollars.
I told the cashier that he was being scammed after he left and they just said "ya, but what can you do?"
You can refuse to process the payment!
I agree, that is why Bitcoin was supposed to be electronic cash, you were supposed to be able to pay for everything with it.
Bitcoin (BTC) doesn't scale today to this purpose, but you can still use it to pay directly for some products and services as long as the other party will accept it. For those wanting Fiat money you could exchange BTC to stablecoins, even in a decentralized way like with ThorChain [0].
What's missing is some seamless bridge between stablecoins and Fiat payment methods and bank accounts. Then you could pay for anything. However I would argue that Bitcoin was meant to become the payment method, as Satoshi Nakamoto described in the whitepaper [1].
[0] https://thorchain.com/
[1] https://www.bitcoin.com/satoshi-archive/whitepaper/