This will make the problem worse as the Portuguese will complain that the foreigners own the beautiful modern buildings.
Additionally it‘s important to keep in mind that this is not feasible for EU countries with the four freedoms. It would be like Florida banning ownership of existing houses for Californians.
(1) would totally kill the Portuguese tourism industry.
(2) is reasonable and they are already doing it - but not sufficiently.
I have a better idea: Tax the nomads with a rate that matches typical tax rates (around 30-40% and waive the crippling social security if health insurance is covered from abroad, not the excessive Portuguese taxes of 53% + 35% social security for a total of 88% on a salary of > 80.000. Nomads are fully exempted because nobody would be willing to pay that much). It would bring more than enough money into the country for house construction.
https://www.portugal.com/news/portugal-officially-ending-gol...
As long as you run an active trading account with them it should be fine for occasional cash movements.
Now that I've been investing with them for a while, they don't seem to mind.
I’m actually surprised there aren’t MORE bogus CVEs out there, based on my experience with bug bounty programs.
C certainly has its faults, and while I have no real experience with Rust, I'm willing to believe that it's significantly better as a language.
But pgvector, at least from a quick scan, looks like a well-written, easily comprehensible C codebase with decent tests. There are undoubtedly lots of hard problems that the developers have solved in implementing it. Putting time and effort into reimplementing all of that in another language because of an aversion to C feels like a waste of effort that could be put into enhancing the existing extension.
Maybe there's something I'm missing? Is the C implementation not as solid as it looks at first glance?
If they are, it'll almost certainly[1] be climate change or nuclear war, it won't be AI.
[1] leaving some wiggle room for pandemics, asteroids, etc.
Am I the only one slightly disturbed by the use of "they" in that sentence? I know that the HN commentariat is broad-based, but I didn't realise we already had non-human members ;-)