Readit News logoReadit News
knowknow commented on Gas Town's agent patterns, design bottlenecks, and vibecoding at scale   maggieappleton.com/gastow... · Posted by u/pavel_lishin
gtowey · 2 months ago
Not even remotely close.

Compilers are deterministic. People who write them test that they will produce correct results. You can expect the same code to compile to the same assembly.

With LLMs two people giving the exact same prompts can get wildly different results. That is not a tool you can use to blindly ship production code. Imagine if your compiler randomly threw in a syscall to delete your hard drive, or decide to pass credentials in plain text. LLMs can and will do those things.

knowknow · 2 months ago
Not only that but compiler optimizations are generally based on rigorous mathematical proofs, so that even without testing them you can be pretty sure it will generate equivalent assembly. From the little I know of LLM's, I'm pretty sure no one has figured out what mathematical principles LLM's are generating code from so you cant be sure its going to right aside from testing it.

Deleted Comment

knowknow commented on Ghostty is now non-profit   mitchellh.com/writing/gho... · Posted by u/vrnvu
miclill · 3 months ago
I recently heard the argument that the license-friction of copyleft sometimes is actually a good thing. Think linux kernel that arguably is more successful than all the BSDs combined (citation needed)...
knowknow · 3 months ago
Keep in mind that Linux doesn’t use the GPL3 and stuck with the GPL2 since the maintainers and Linus Torvalds thought that it was overly restrictive [1]. So at some point the license friction becomes too large to be practical for organizations to use or contribute to.

[1] https://youtu.be/PaKIZ7gJlRU

knowknow commented on A Love Letter to FreeBSD   tara.sh/posts/2025/2025-1... · Posted by u/rbanffy
knowknow · 4 months ago
It seems FreeBSD is becoming more talked about in enthusiast communities simply because Linux is a lot more mainstream now and there’s a joy in contrarianism rather than any real changes with either of the two operating systems.
knowknow commented on U.S. bombs Iranian nuclear sites   bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg3r... · Posted by u/mattcollins
lwansbrough · 9 months ago
There sure are a lot of people in here who are defaulting to "nuclear proliferation is okay" by thinking that not being involved somehow solves the problem. You are in a prisoner's dilemma. Choosing not to participate is still participating.
knowknow · 9 months ago
You do realize that there are ways to avoid nuclear proliferation without war? The US had a deal with Iran and multiple other countries that made them limit their nuclear capabilities, but the US withdrew from it in 2018.
knowknow commented on National Archives Releases Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Records   archives.gov/press/press-... · Posted by u/gnabgib
knowknow · a year ago
It’s amazing how something that has not resulted in any concrete examples or real world implications can cause such a hysteria for decades.
knowknow commented on Jellyfin as a Spotify alternative   coppolaemilio.com/entries... · Posted by u/coppolaemilio
knowknow · a year ago
What’s wrong with Spotify?
knowknow commented on 4chan Sharty Hack And Janitor Email Leak   knowyourmeme.com/memes/ev... · Posted by u/LookAtThatBacon
CamelCaseName · a year ago
If you lamented the disappearance of the "old internet", well, this was a part of it, and now it may be gone too.

The title is also a fair bit understated.

They're leaking the moderators home addresses and work contact info (for admins, who are(were?) paid moderators)

knowknow · a year ago
Is it considered part of it? From my understanding, the culture has changed significantly and post get auto deleted eventually, so it’s not a good archive either. The only thing old about it is it’s web design
knowknow commented on Usability Improvements in GCC 15   developers.redhat.com/art... · Posted by u/dmalcolm
dralley · a year ago
Yet another reason why I'm not a fan of Richard Stallman.

Most of the decisions he made over the past 25 years have been self-defeating and led directly to the decline of the influence of his own movement. It's not that "the GCC project" avoided that for ideological reason, Stallman was personally a veto on that issue for years, and his personal objection led to several people quitting the project for LLVM, with a couple saying as much directly to him.

https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2014-01/msg00247.html

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-01/msg00...

(both threads are interesting reading in their entirety, not just those specific emails)

knowknow · a year ago
Kind like how GPL 3 makes it infeasible for most companies to use/support free software. At least Stallman gets to feel morally superior though
knowknow commented on What if we made advertising illegal?   simone.org/advertising/... · Posted by u/smnrg
knowknow · a year ago
> The financial incentives to create addictive digital content would instantly disappear, and so would the mechanisms that allow both commercial and political actors to create personalized, reality-distorting bubbles.

...

> But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

Humanity had hatred and insular bubbles a millennia ago just fine without advertisements. There was genocides and wars before the current form of ads ever emerged. It's a shame that so many people think that changing a financial policy is all that is needed to change an ingrained human behavior.

u/knowknow

KarmaCake day315November 6, 2024View Original