From <1yo results on setting up an anonymous instagram account: Different email address, different phone number and I'll add setting up from a different device and IP.
Lots of email options, like disroot.org.
If your phone takes a physical sim, you can buy a new prepaid starter.
Or sign up with a MVNO like anveo.com and get a forwarding number
(incoming text only w/ that last)
A public library would connect you with a different device and IP
If you succeed, there may be some risk of identification when you add family to your contacts. I'm not savvy enough to guide you thru that tho.ref: https://kagi.com/search?q=How+to+set+up+an+anonymous+instagr...
I have been trying a combination of those—though the app doesn't like GrapheneOS either, I suspect. I transitioned most of my overseas family to Signal and other channels, though some of them just won't—and I understand that.
P.S. Happy to see another Kagi user help here. :)
In this specific case, however, it wasn't for general browsing. After living overseas for more than a decade, you realize that, for some people, these platforms function as essential infrastructure. I can't force my old aunt on Signal or Matrix or whatever. It had become the only channel to call my 76yo uncle. Family I'd just reconnected with. This is especially true during a divorce with far away aging family members.
My post is less about my need for Instagram and more about the systemic problem: what recourse does a person have when a company's automated moderation fails and the original reason for the ban is proven invalid? That's the technical/procedural question I'm hoping to find an answer for.
I think you illustrated why the concept exists. USA actually has "America" in its name, unlike others - hence 'Americans' and not 'USsians'.
Which, I think, is fair, as South and Latin are also America. And so is Canada. And so was Francis.
But I usually find it a hard concept to convey to my fellow local USsians.