I just kept peeling back to that because for each product I tried to build I still ended up reverting back to a big ass text file to manage my building of my product!
Only the current version is the one I have been able to stick with. It starts with text editor as the foundation and then adds features (that are hidden) on top of that.
Hoping to release to some friends in Sep.
I know it's common advice for students and newly grads to do this, but in my experience, employers do not care about personal software projects or open-source contributions unless the work is aligned with their product. That, or you built something that is easily lucrative. Otherwise, they do not care, they do not care, they do not care.
If your goal is personal enrichment, by all means, but don't kill yourself on a personal project with the intention of impressing an employer.
They say they have good results?
This has always made me wonder if anybody really builds anything from scratch any more. With so many frameworks, even for basic static sites, I wonder who's out there writing HTML, CSS and JS from scratch.
Or is something that has been regulated to the dustbin of history?
Other references: https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-buzz/is-the-velvet-...
Fake account that fooled journalists: https://x.com/Velvet_Sundown
Real account: https://x.com/tvs_music
Wild that it's possible to take over an internet identity at the start of their notoriety.
Other references: https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-buzz/is-the-velvet-...
Fake account that fooled journalists: https://x.com/Velvet_Sundown
Real account: https://x.com/tvs_music
What I mean is that a 70% score is meaningless to me. I need to know the movie genre, the audience score, the age of the movie and then I basically do a “lookup table” in my head. And I have that lookup table because I’ve looked up every movie I’ve watched on RT for 15 years so I know how the scores correlate to my own personal opinions.
As an example: the author said that critic scores should align with audience scores but no that’s not true at all. Critics tend to care more about plot continuity, plot depth and details while the audience tends to care about enjoyability. Both are important to me so I always look at both scores. That’s why a lot of very funny comedies have a 60-69% critic score but a 90%-100% audience score — because it’s hilarious but the plot makes no fucking sense and has a million holes. And if you see a comedy with 95% critic but 70% audience, it will be thought-provoking and well done but don’t expect more than occasional chuckles.
Additionally, I think someone could build an interesting RT browser based on these kinds of insights.