Good luck.

"It seems Anthropic and OpenAI are already engaged. Would it be correct to assume that they will assist in creating the curriculum?

Yes"

And, of course, the solution proposed is to bring more AI and "AI literacy" even though:

"Still, 40% of the more than 2,000 teachers polled say they don't use AI at all. And more than half believe weekly use of AI by students would decrease their ability to think independently and critically."

"Another recent survey by Gallup, the Walton Family Foundation and GSV Ventures found that nearly half of Generation Z students think AI will hurt their ability to think about information carefully."

So there is this sentence:

> Check out the full thread and the quote-posts, and you can see I found more such troubling AI-generated ‘definitions’, even embedded via hyperlinks in scientific articles on ScienceDirect.

I warned about this not so long ago:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44274487

Plenty more are coming soon, I suppose, and it will be interesting to see what the effect will be upon Elsevier's brand.

Yes, maybe; I'd argue that what is happening now is because the business cases are still not really there.