The sophistry of his argument is extreme.
Yes, of course there are always "unknown unknowns"-- but the statement "there is no evidence that Iraq is supplying WMDs to terrorists" is not a statement made in a vacuum, in which all permutations of known/unknown are equally likely.
He's proven himself thin skinned, egotistical, and capricious, and is easy to provoke into vindictive & retributive actions even if not in his best interests.
I think a big part of why he bought twitter was a sense of grievance, basically that the wrong people were getting positive attention, that people were being mean to and making fun of him and his friends & allies. He wanted to restructure the mechanics and incentives of the platform to better support the people and outcomes he values.
I'm not sure whether he succeeded by these terms either, it's still too early to tell I think. But I do think it's an important factor in evaluating whether he succeeded in what he set out to do when buying twitter.
And from that perspective "make it good or (let it) die trying" may be an acceptable compromise. He doesn't get the musk-adoration platform he wants, but at least there is no longer the musk-ridicule platform he perceived it to be.
clip_video () {
ffmpeg -ss "$2" -i "$1" -t "$3" -c copy "$4"
}
Used like so: clip_video filename.mp4 start_point duration output.mp4 if [ -z $3 ]
then
echo "usage: $0 file start_seconds duration [scale=600] [fps=15] [crop]"
exit 1
fi
if [ -z $4 ]
then
SCALE=600
else
# w=iw/2:h=ih/2 half size
SCALE="$4"
fi
if [ -z $5 ]
then
FPS=15
else
FPS=$5
fi
if [ -z $6 ]
then
CROP="crop=iw:ih:0:0,"
else
# CROP="600:ih:250:0" full height
CROP="setsar=1,crop=${6},"
fi
rm "${1}.gif" &> /dev/null
ffmpeg -ss $2 -t $3 -i "$1" -vf ${CROP}fps=${FPS},scale=${SCALE}:-1:flags=lanczos,palettegen palette.png -loglevel error
ffmpeg -ss $2 -t $3 -i "$1" -i palette.png -filter_complex "${CROP}fps=${FPS},scale=${SCALE}:-1:flags=lanczos[x];[x][1:v]paletteuse" "${1}.gif" -loglevel error