I think there is another side to the story though with many people who lost money buying the stock (selling options is different) based on his advice. Gill is held to a much higher standard than a normal person as he is a licensed security broker.
If you look at my comment history on HN, you will see at the time I was pointing out a lot of Redditors were engaging in a pump and dump scheme. Pump and dumps are illegal and regulated by the SEC. If Gill, a licensed security broker, is found to have been a part of this he could end up losing.
Why? Because they ticked the "I'm an experienced options trader" box? This guy did, but clearly didn't understand how options worked.
I know Hacktoberfest is certainly exacerbating the problem, but as an open-source contributor for ~2 years myself, but someone who has been working on side projects using GitHub for like 7 years now I've noticed a significant uptick in bullshit PRs in the past year or so.
I have a hunch it's because a lot of bootcamps / tutorials / etc are encouraging students to just "contribute to open source." People may either not know exactly what that entails, or may just be just as lazy in their bootcamp as they were in school.
I've gotten PRs on my school projects from 5 years ago fixing typos in comments. I'm not sure how people even find those repos, and I'm even more confused why they'd feel the need to "contribute" unless someone is telling them to without any additional context.
They didn't tell us to pick random projects from 5 years ago but they also didn't go into ettiquette about commits or really how to properly contribute, just "make sure your github is very active because that's what employers and recruiters want to see." My anxiety shoots through the roof just thinking about hitting up some random school project though...that's a bit far for me lol.
https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/all_publications/living_...
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/chart-of-the-day-thes...
https://theconversation.com/emissions-inequality-there-is-a-...
"I am a 15 year old front-end web developer and am working on growing sleepsources.com"
Deleted Comment
That makes sense but I’m a bit surprised at how many people immediately started the charge back process and said it was fraudulent. I looked at my statement, saw the cost matched up with the amount I was to be charged that same day and put two and two together. Flipper might not have alerted to the different name in a timely way, but they sent out a bunch of emails counting down to the day people would be charged.
If that is the case, the blame falls mostly on the Flipper folks for the lack of clarity of who would be charging backers. I’d say a there’s a bit of blame on the people charging back w/ fraud claims so quickly, too. The likelihood of your card being used fraudulently for the exact amount you were scheduled to be charged on the expected day is incredibly low.