The same applies in the physical world. Police has no right to enter your house. Except when they have a warrant, because you are already known to be guilty.
>The criminals will just move to another operating scheme.
Great! This is not an excuse to do nothing. They would use e2e if they were smart anyway. But they don't, because they like telegram and e2e is annoying to use (no channel history etc).
Also, warrants are when there is evidence to suggest guilt. You are not known to be guilty. That is the point of the warrant, to collect more evidence to prove guilt.
>Telegram founder Pavel Durov warned that France risks societal collapse if it continues down a path of political censorship and regulatory overreach. Durov was arrested in France in August 2024 after being accused of failing to moderate his app to reduce criminality
Telegram is the messenger of choice for cybercriminals (not signal, interestingly). Most stealers and many other malware families use telegram to exfiltrate data and stolen credentials. It's also used as public announcement channels for criminal groups. Telegram ignores all reports about known malicious chats, despite it being easily provable, not to mention it's not e2e encrypted.
At this point this is not resisting censorship but knowingly profiting from crime. Continuing the analogy, it's like post office was sending mails for terrorists, despite police staying in the hallway and begging them to stop that.
(my job is related to anti-malware and cybercrime prevention)
Even making them visible has drawn the ire of Trump a few times already.
But I generally agree that it can't go on forever / not how it works historically.
Its a underhanded forced recruitment tool.
I once went to a job interview with Google. I built one of the first local (Global to the Netherlands) search engines of the Netherlands, but the guy in the cowboy hat at Google asked me to write a binary search with a marker and a whiteboard. I never write with my hand, I always use keyboards. Plus I'm being insulted to write a binary search when I designed and build a search index and retrieval engine.
[I did the binary search but was not happy with the whole process that did not want to even look at what you had actually done before, because that would take away the baseline they wanted].
I guess they must have been looking for cowboys. Tip for interviews, take your cowboy hat, just in case..