Readit News logoReadit News
jason_pomerleau commented on Child's Play: Tech's new generation and the end of thinking   harpers.org/archive/2026/... · Posted by u/ramimac
jason_pomerleau · 21 days ago
> A man paced in front of the advertisement, chanting to himself. “This . . . is . . . necessary! This . . . is . . . necessary!” On each “necessary” he swung his arms up in exaltation.

Tangential, but this sounds an awful lot like Disgustipated (‘The Cries of the Carrots’) a ‘hidden’ song on the Tool album Undertow, including the exaltation part: the narrator of the song is a preacher.

jason_pomerleau commented on How will the miracle happen today?   kk.org/thetechnium/how-wi... · Posted by u/zdw
NaOH · 2 months ago
It's a choice. I go to the supermarket twice a week, not shopping for much. I switched the store I use three, four months ago, but I can already talk about some of the employees at the store I visit. Louis is back where he grew up right now because his 97-year-old grandfather died. Among other things, he feels lucky grandpa's passing came after the new year because of his time-off allotment. Nikki had great holidays, mostly because her adult daughter was here for a week. Nadine ("Shh.") has decided she's going to retire at the end of the month but hasn't yet told anyone at the store.

Raffy, the UPS delivery guy I see maybe five times a year? He's doing well, finally feeling things slowing down some after the holidays. His fiancé will finish her graduate degree this spring, then they're going to decide if they want to stay here or move back to the state where they were born. They like it here, but think job opportunities will be better back home.

I'm sure many here are familiar with "This is Water," the commencement speech given by David Foster Wallace. Many often cite his line, "Everybody worships," his observation that we all hold aspects of life in reverence, whether religious things or otherwise. It's a valid, pithy point, but I always thought the key part to his speech comes later and has been widely overlooked:

And the so-called real world will not discourage you from operating on your default settings, because the so-called real world of men and money and power hums merrily along in a pool of fear and anger and frustration and craving and worship of self. Our own present culture has harnessed these forces in ways that have yielded extraordinary wealth and comfort and personal freedom. The freedom all to be lords of our tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the centre of all creation. This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But of course there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talk about much in the great outside world of wanting and achieving.... The really important kind of freedom involves attention and awareness and discipline, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them over and over in myriad petty, unsexy ways every day.

He delivered that speech in 2005. Before the modern smartphone. All those people I mentioned earlier were strangers. That's no longer the case because all of us chose to interrupt what we were doing and open up a little to someone unfamiliar. It's a choice. Or, as Bob Dylan once sang,

Freedom, just around the corner from you

But with truth so far off, what good will it do

jason_pomerleau · 2 months ago
This was a deeply moving comment, and has changed my perspective in a way that I will never forget. Thank you.
jason_pomerleau commented on Some people can't see mental images   newyorker.com/magazine/20... · Posted by u/petalmind
Matterless · 4 months ago
I don't know why I'm surprised every time to see so many people astounded in the comments every time another of these articles come out. I guess I thought by now this phenomenon would be more common knowledge... I'm a non-seer and a non-self speaker. That is, I do not have any clear monologue whatsoever, nor can I visualize anything at all. However, I have a pretty great memory, just not for the experience of things, but instead only the circumstances, the trivia, the conclusions, and all of those can be very granular.

Words exist for me in the space beyond my lips, or my fingertips; what that feels like, in the moment, is that it is the act of externalization of words which makes them come into being, but not for a moment are they ever out of my control.

I can't remember the sound of my mother's voice. Not really. Of course if I heard it in a recording it would be as recognizable as any voice, and in fact when I watch animated shows, like classic King of the Hill for example, I'm extremely good at picking out all the celebrity voices and I'm often surprised that I can identify a voice I didn't know that I knew.

I used to have an internal monologue. I used to be able to picture things. That all went away in my teens. Not only can I somewhat remember what that was like, I'm able to experience vivid internal pictures and internal sounds sometimes in the moments just before I'm fully asleep. It doesn't happen very frequently, but it's enjoyable when it does.

And that's it. If you have any questions for thisaphantasic non-self-speaker, have at it.

jason_pomerleau · 4 months ago
What is it like to read fiction? Tolkien’s writing comes to mind as a good example: many passages of Lord of the Rings are detailed descriptions of the surrounding landscape. Are these types of works just not enjoyable?
jason_pomerleau commented on An image of an archeologist adventurer who wears a hat and uses a bullwhip   theaiunderwriter.substack... · Posted by u/participant3
mlsu · a year ago
I was really hoping that the conversation around AI art would at least be partially centered on the perhaps now dated "2008 pirate party" idea that intellectual property, the royalty system, the draconian copyright laws that we have today are deeply silly, rooted in a fiction, and used over and over again, primarily by the rich and powerful, to stifle original ideas and hold back cultural innovation.

Unfortunately, it's just the opposite. It seems most people have fully assimilated the idea that information itself must be entirely subsumed into an oppressive, proprietary, commercial apparatus. That Disney Corp can prevent you from viewing some collection of pixels, because THEY own it, and they know better than you do about the culture and communication that you are and are not allowed to experience.

It's just baffling. If they could, Disney would scan your brain to charge you a nickel every time you thought of Mickey Mouse.

jason_pomerleau · a year ago
> If they could, Disney would scan your brain to charge you a nickel every time you thought of Mickey Mouse.

This reminds me of Tom Scott’s “Welcome to Life: The Singularity, Ruined by Lawyers” [1]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFe9wiDfb0E

jason_pomerleau commented on Ask HN: What are the best programmable holiday lights?    · Posted by u/sh1mmer
havnagiggle · a year ago
Is Govee the down-cone style? Or are there also others doing that? There's been a couple of houses that have this and I wasn't sure what they are using, but it's the only one that I would consider doing whole house exterior. Many others look too sharp.
jason_pomerleau · a year ago
Yes, though they have other types too. We’ve been thrilled with ours. I’ve never done Christmas lights because I don’t do ladders, so having a permanent fixture is attractive. Plus we can use them on big holidays too.

I have big reservations about ‘smart home’ stuff, and it’s only the second such device in our house. But I’m clearly losing that battle, and will be looking into some ways to mitigate the privacy concerns. But gosh, it sure is nice to pick from a gazillion light patterns.

jason_pomerleau commented on Smart Contract Security Field Guide   scsfg.io/... · Posted by u/dmuhs
Uptrenda · 3 years ago
I find posts like this honestly infuriating because its like you don't know the first thing about an entire, specialized field, yet because its something taking place in tech you feel like you're qualified to write about it. Ask the same question about chemistry, biology, electrical engineering, or any STEM subject, and here's the actual answer: it's beyond the scope of a comment on hacker news to spoon feed you an entire fucking field in a way that will make sense to you.

You will have to read papers, and think about what works and doesn't, over years to understand what is going on. And to be ahead of the curve -- you'll also have to do your own experiments that 9/10 won't yield any interesting results. In the blockchain and 'crypto' industry we also have the problem that entry is easy while skilled execution is not. Consequently: many fuck-ups have happened. It's easy to point to them and say that 'this is the industry' but its really not. Those are a few bad eggs.

jason_pomerleau · 3 years ago
Genuine question from someone on the outside watching all of this: then who are these things for? Apparently not me, nor GP, nor my mum and dad. Are we waiting until the Smart People sort out all of these complex details to make this stuff accessible for regular people?
jason_pomerleau commented on James Cameron slams OceanGate safety, regrets not speaking up more   npr.org/2023/06/23/118397... · Posted by u/evo_9
happytoexplain · 3 years ago
There is another cost of not regulating:

If I live in a society that is keen on regulation, then I feel more safe doing things. I can not have information in my head about what all is regulated and how much. When I do things in the US, I feel safe (relative to known risks), because I believe we are a high-regulation society (feel free to argue that). If that image starts to slip, then I have to start asking myself: Should I take my kids on this helicopter ride at the county fair? Should I go down this remote cliffside road on public transport? Should I get in this old elevator? Should I leave this electrical appliance running while I sleep?

Maybe it's a little thing in the big picture, but some people value it immensely, and many Americans appear to be those people. Declining to regulate deep-sea subs, or whatever else, maybe doesn't have any practical effect, but it is one little chip out of the image of high-regulation.

jason_pomerleau · 3 years ago
When I was 16 years old I took a job at a travelling carnival that was in town for a long weekend. My job was to run a helicopter ride for little kids. The green button started the ride, the red button stopped it. And if it didn’t start, I was instructed to give the control unit a moderate smack. It worked.

This was in Canada, ~1990. Awhile ago admittedly, but I haven’t looked at travelling fair rides the same way since.

jason_pomerleau commented on iPhone Doomed to Failure (2008)   networkworld.com/article/... · Posted by u/peterjuras
jason_pomerleau · 3 years ago
Funny side story about this publication. I worked at a company that sold a network monitoring appliance that was ‘reviewed’ by them. We found the review… surprising, prompting us to inspect the demo appliance that they’d sent back to us.

They hadn’t even fired it up. The review was, as far as we could tell, entirely fabricated. We brought this to the editorial team’s attention. They responded by adding a few points to our scores.

jason_pomerleau commented on Thanks Dang, Happy Holidays   news.ycombinator.com/thre... · Posted by u/O__________O
galangalalgol · 3 years ago
Oh, yeah, I agree that tact is simply a form of dishonesty. I just don't really care if I am wrong or right, and I project that on to others. Since they don't care if they are right, they won't mind me calmly telling them all the reasons they are wrong. If they get upset at that when defending their position then my instinct is to assume they are irrational. But what my friends taught me is that passionate arguments, like most instincts can be used as a shortcut to bypass work. So becoming impassioned as I tell them all the reasons they are wrong, can help my argument.
jason_pomerleau · 3 years ago
Some people will respond well to this - I'm one of them - but many (most?) won't.

> tact is simply a form of dishonesty

Maybe it is, but our primate brains tend to get very attached to our ideas and opinions. People aren't rational. Tactfulness is one way to get the other side to see your argument without making them feel threatened. Is it manipulative? Sure. But in many cases it's the only path that will get results.

u/jason_pomerleau

KarmaCake day413February 21, 2013View Original