Why would you assume someone would write the paper at all, if the problem was uninteresting?
For one thing, because I watch the AI and ML categories on arxiv.org.
Readit Newsinimino commented on Research suggests Big Bang may have taken place inside a black hole port.ac.uk/news-events-an... · Posted by u/zaik
inimino commented on Research suggests Big Bang may have taken place inside a black hole port.ac.uk/news-events-an... · Posted by u/zaik
This is a good thing. This is where the economy surplus went. Not to 5 days of leisure for everyone. But to jobs that keep us occupied, engaged, and motivated but aren't strictly required. The alternative is just either starving everyone to death, except for a few elite and their slaves, or everyone being bored out of their minds and wondering what the point of life is.
If the solution is ever more manuscripts that solve no interesting problems and that nobody will ever read, let's find another solution.
inimino commented on Magistral — the first reasoning model by Mistral AI mistral.ai/news/magistral... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
Because we do not have a complete understanding of human neurons. How are we supposed to accurately model something we cannot directly observe?
Just because you don't know how does not mean that we can't.
inimino commented on Qwen3: Think deeper, act faster qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwe... · Posted by u/synthwave
inimino commented on Qwen3: Think deeper, act faster qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwe... · Posted by u/synthwave
No, Wittgenstein's rule following paradox, Shannon sampling theorem, the law that infinite polynomials pass through any finite set of points (does that have a name?), etc, etc. are all equivalent at the limit to the idea that no amount of anecdotes-per-se add up to anything other than coincidence
No, no, no. Each of them gives you information.
They used the money on the election campaign.
All I have seen is that four people worked for the party while being paid by the EU. Nothing like routing money to advertising campaigns or anything that would actually swing an election. And the headlines are all about embezzlement, not election fraud. So this seems like a stretch.
That argument makes sense in most cases. If the candidate is a rapist, voters can and should be the ones to disqualify them.
But this is a case of cheating. If a candidate cheats in an election, that should disqualify them because otherwise the election is tainted.
This is an embezzlement case. No-one tampered with election results, so can you explain how there is any logic to your argument?
inimino commented on Ask HN: Any insider takes on Yann LeCun's push against current architectures? · Posted by u/vessenes
That would mean with current resources AI can get so much more intelligent than humans, right? Aren't you scared?
That's a potential outcome of any increase in training efficiency.
Which we should expect, even from prior experience with any other AI breakthrough, where first we learn to do it and then we learn to do it efficiently.
E.g. Deep Blue in 1997 was IBM showing off a supercomputer, more than it was any kind of reasonably efficient algorithm, but those came over the next 20-30 years.
inimino commented on Ask HN: Any insider takes on Yann LeCun's push against current architectures? · Posted by u/vessenes
How are you separating the efficiency of the architecture from the efficiency of the substrate? Unless you have a brain made of transistors or an LLM made of neurons how can you identify the source of the inefficiency?
You can't but the transistor-based approach is the inefficient one, and transistors are pretty good at efficiently doing logic, so either there's no possible efficient solution based on deterministic computation, or there's tremendous headroom.
I believe human and machine learning unify into a pretty straightforward model and this shows that what we're doing that ML doesn't can be copied across, and I don't think the substrate is that significant.
You're right, that snippet was ai-generated and I forgot to action one of my todos to fix that snippet. This was negligent on my part, and I hope you'll forgive me.
We're fixing that right now, thank you for the correction!
You may be interested in the verb "to act". If you are an AI, you must have been trained on some sad corporate dataset.