Readit News logoReadit News
idorosen commented on Ultrasonic Chef's Knife   seattleultrasonics.com/... · Posted by u/hemloc_io
idorosen · 3 months ago
They claim to be the first, but a simple google search shows several other ultrasonic kitchen knives out there. (369sonic, etc.) dating back years.
idorosen commented on Nest 1st gen and 2nd gen thermostats no longer supported from Oct 25   community.hubitat.com/t/n... · Posted by u/RyanShook
user_7832 · 3 months ago
> a simple (but secure!) local API

A bit of an unusual idea, but: if the users of such a thing are folks who're already playing with HA and are tech savvy, why not just expose the API and tell users that they're "only allowed to use the "hacker's update in good faith" if they put the devices on a separate network without internet access?

Your team doesn't need to spend a ton of time on making it super secure, and DIYers can continue to use the hardware for as long as it physically works, me thinks

idorosen · 3 months ago
Liability.
idorosen commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
0xbadcafebee · 4 months ago
Option 1: enabling "dubious regurgitations of information"

Option 2: enabling draconian abuse of power, violation of privacy, and mass surveillance

idorosen · 4 months ago
The point was that Wikipedia blocking the UK today would not have the same effect as blocking it a decade ago during previous similar censorship attempts. It would likely be less effective.

However, those aren’t not the only two options. Wikipedia could block editing from the UK, or it could simply not comply and wait for an enforcement action.

What recourse would the UK have in any case of such an enforcement action if the law or regulation Wikipedia faces does not exist in the US, where Wikipedia is ostensibly based if it removed all financial or physical presence from the UK?

idorosen commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
idorosen · 4 months ago
To all of the commenters recommending that Wikipedia block UK visitors: This is incredibly short-sighted in the age of LLMs, where Wikipedia does not need to exist in a country in order for the benefit of its existence to be felt. Such a move would likely just drive people to obtain dubious regurgitations of Wikipedia’s (freely available) content via their favorite LLM chatbot, in my opinion.
idorosen commented on Physical Media Is Cool Again. Streaming Services Have Themselves to Blame   rollingstone.com/culture/... · Posted by u/coloneltcb
nayuki · 4 months ago
Applying wrong definitions results in confusion and contradictions.

If "digital" means "by means of communication rather than delivering physical objects", then a digital camera held in your hand is not "digital". (But operating someone else's camera over the Internet would be a "digital camera".) Conversely, receiving music over analog FM radio would be "digital" because the information came from far away.

If "digital" means electronic, then printing a black-and-white QR Code (which is clearly made of discrete squares) onto paper makes that paper image not "digital". DNA with its 4 possible base pairs would not be digital. Doing accounting with pen and paper, involving discrete numbers, would not be digital. Moreover, an electronic computer made of analog capacitors, resistors, transistors, and op-amps - and with a continuous range of input and output values - would be classified as "digital" under this definition. On the other hand, sending 0s and 1s as photons in a fiber-optic cable would not be considered digital as the signal is not electrical or electronic in nature.

If "digital" means high-tech, then inventing an analog computer chip in the year 2026 would be considered more "digital" than conventional digital computer chips invented in the 1970s. (This isn't theoretical; there are researchers working on analog computers for neural networks to save die area and power consumption.)

By misusing definitions for "digital", things that are not digital get misclassified as digital, while things that are digital get misclassified as non-digital.

The only correct definition of digital with respect to information technology is the involvement of numerical digits. Everything else are qualities associated with popular digital systems, but are not fundamental definitions of digital systems.

idorosen · 4 months ago
Pure pedantry. The meaning in context was clear to a reasonable fluent reader such as yourself. Instead of focusing on pedantic form, I suggest focusing on the intent and content of TFA: Is physical media cool again and if so, why.
idorosen commented on Physical Media Is Cool Again. Streaming Services Have Themselves to Blame   rollingstone.com/culture/... · Posted by u/coloneltcb
do_not_redeem · 4 months ago
A journalist making a mistake != language change

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/digital

Which of these definitions means "fancier than what the speaker grew accustomed to during their formative years from 10-30 years old"?

idorosen · 4 months ago
Vernacular shifts as society and technology change. As evidence, it doesn't seem like you or GP misunderstood the journalist's meaning. This is pedantry.
idorosen commented on Physical Media Is Cool Again. Streaming Services Have Themselves to Blame   rollingstone.com/culture/... · Posted by u/coloneltcb
nayuki · 4 months ago
I'd say the article is largely correct, but I have at least one nitpick:

> ‘How do you burn a CD?’ It’s something that was common for us growing up, but that’s knowledge that’s being lost as everything is sort of transitioning to digital.”

This paragraph is using a colloquial but wrong definition of the word "digital" - in this context it seems to mean "online audio/video distribution".

This is wrong because CDs, by definition, hold digital data. Some of us who are old enough to have lived through the transition from unapologetically analog audio media - vinyl records and magnetic cassette tape - to digital, optical compact discs. That was the real transition to digital, not the transition from digital physical media to digital online downloads (both are still digital). Likewise, the transition from analog broadcast TV and analog VHS tapes to digital TV and VCD/DVD/BD was less than 20 years ago. (Side note: LaserDisc stores video analogly but audio digitally.)

Digital is a word that fundamentally contrasts with analog - where analog means infinite variation, no resistance to noise, and imperfect copies. Digital simply means being composed of integers, which further implies finite information and allows perfect copies.

The misuse of the word digital to mean superfluous things is a mockery to the monumental human achievement in inventing and perfecting digital machines and methods of storing/transmitting images and sounds, being much higher quality than previous analog technologies (e.g. photographic film) and allowing information to be delivered reliably across wider space and time.

Digital does not imply electronic, new and high-tech, virtual, or communications-based (as opposed to transporting matter-based recording media). Mechanical LEGO logic is digital. DNA is digital and very old. Alphabets are digital (we agree today there are exactly 26 letters in English). The telegraph network was digital and messages were relayed by humans. A "virtual" meeting involving digital videoconferencing could just as well be held using analog NTSC video channels; the fact that digital technology happened to be used doesn't define the virtual meeting. "Digital marketing" is understood as doing business on the web/Internet through electronic online communications, but I could argue that a paper brochure designed on a digital computer is also "digital marketing".

idorosen · 4 months ago
Languages change over time.
idorosen commented on A literary magazine accessible only via telnet    · Posted by u/edent
idorosen · 6 months ago
Title is incorrect, it's also accessible via their website at the second-level domain (anewsession.com).
idorosen commented on LoRA vs. Full Fine-Tuning: An Illusion of Equivalence   arxiv.org/abs/2410.21228... · Posted by u/timbilt
idorosen · a year ago
Jacob Andreas is one of the smartest people I’ve ever met.

u/idorosen

KarmaCake day375December 14, 2007
About
Machine learning, neuroscience, distributed systems, quant trading.

Worked at Columbia University, UChicago, Argonne National Lab, Caltech/NASA JPL, Quant/HFT firms, Amazon, Google. PPL-IR.

Opinions expressed are my own, and do not reflect the views of my employer.

Email: ido@uchicago.edu / ido@kernel.org

Website: https://ido.ai

PGP key fingerprint: F353 09F4 93E8 F6D3 3973 5A70 A669 D000 2389 BB21

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/ido; my proof: https://keybase.io/ido/sigs/ptEk1wOSwrGBMigTw5eyVOwdVucfiPAq645cLXJgt0c ]

View Original