Readit News logoReadit News
holmberd commented on AWS Ground Station   aws.amazon.com/ground-sta... · Posted by u/leoh
paranoidrobot · 6 years ago
That's what the snowballs are for.
holmberd · 6 years ago
Without a doubt.
holmberd commented on WireGuard Gives Linux a Faster, More Secure VPN   wired.com/story/wireguard... · Posted by u/axiomdata316
holmberd · 6 years ago
I've used IVPN for years and it works flawlessly.
holmberd commented on GitHub Outage   githubstatus.com/?test... · Posted by u/geerlingguy
geerlingguy · 6 years ago
I've been getting 500 errors on any page load for the past 10 minutes or so. The status page just shows 'webhook' errors, but it looks like it's more widespread than that.

Time to go get caffeine and take a morning break!

holmberd · 6 years ago
Posting here isn't part of your break :)
holmberd commented on Show HN: I published my first website – ShellMagic.xyz   shellmagic.xyz... · Posted by u/manjana
holmberd · 6 years ago
Your disclaimer modal doesn't fit on mobile causing the viewport to extend outside expected bounds. Otherwise looks nice.
holmberd commented on The first solar road has turned out to be a disappointing failure   sciencealert.com/the-worl... · Posted by u/lxm
caymanjim · 7 years ago
This was not at all a failure. They built a 1km experimental road. They gained valuable information about real-world performance and technical challenges. It's not as though they built a 100km long six-lane highway with unproven technology. They built a tiny one-lane trial to test a promising idea.

It was overhyped by politicians, but what isn't? Maybe they even steamrolled over engineering red flags. That doesn't mean it wasn't a valuable experiment.

holmberd · 7 years ago
Exactly, failure or not is a good thing, moving on.
holmberd commented on Browser extensions are underrated: the promise of hackable software   geoffreylitt.com/2019/07/... · Posted by u/gklitt
ohazi · 7 years ago
I don't agree with the author. He pays lip service to security being important, but then proceeds to ignore the threat because he thinks extensions are great. I think people should be more hesitant to install a browser extension than just about any other piece of software.

The threat is absolutely real. Bad actors regularly offer large paydays to lone developers with popular extensions so they can roll out an update that quietly adds a backdoor.

There's at least some publicly documented evidence that Raymond Hill (uBlock Origin) isn't likely to cave to this sort of pressure, but do you really believe that none of the other authors of your fifteen favorite extensions would look the other way for $100k?

Keep in mind that these offers don't look like "Here's some money, please let us roll out an evil update to your extension." They look like "Our company has a product with a similar name. We love your extension and would like to offer to acquire it from you so that we can use the name. We'll even let you keep the rights to your software so that you can re-release it under a different name if you'd like!" They'll make it really easy for the developer to remain in denial about what they're actually facilitating.

holmberd · 7 years ago
This is not limited to Chrome extensions. If you build and publish any kind of software, there is a high chance that someone shady will come along and offer you money for it, or to become an "affiliate" partner.
holmberd commented on Finding My Next Bootstrapped Business Idea   derrickreimer.com/essays/... · Posted by u/derrickreimer
jguimont · 7 years ago
I would like to know your opinion on "When to drop the ball when trying to build a business?" You need to persevere, but like playing poker, you invested so much energy that it might be hard to pull the plug. Success might be just around the corner...
holmberd · 7 years ago
You are referring to sunk cost fallacy.
holmberd commented on Google AdWords Exploit Seen in the Wild   wp.josh.com/2019/05/06/br... · Posted by u/luu
tpetry · 7 years ago
If a large brand like Uber wouldn‘t buy (really expensive) keywords like „uber“ some of their rivals like lyft could bid on it. So uber would lose a customer who was really interested in uber to lyft. Exchange company names how you like. Its especially expensive for shops etc.

Google will not change any rules to forbid bidding on brand names because they are making a ton of money of it. Think of something like amazon paying more than $1 for every click just to not loose any potential customer. Adwords is a money burning system.

holmberd · 7 years ago
They have some rules in place, try bidding on Fortnite.
holmberd commented on The Route of a Text Message   scottbot.net/the-route-of... · Posted by u/ericlott
holmberd · 7 years ago
Still common to call it BTS (GSM era) contra RBS in the states?

u/holmberd

KarmaCake day57March 20, 2016View Original