I’d rather take the Occam’s razor approach here instead of the conspiracy theorist one.
Health care execs are always under litigation. They are the named officers of their corporate units and therefore the legal representatives of their entities.
Private health care aggrieves hundreds to thousands of people a day. It’s rather someone who lost a loved one or who is in financial distress due to decisions made by this corporation than some deep dark conspiracy.
One thing that doesn't factor into this argument is the professional nature of the hit — how he managed the gun, the silencer, the messages on the bullets, the getaway, and the precise reconnaissance that allowed him to know exactly where his target would be at that exact moment.
That doesn't align with the characteristics of a typical personal vendetta.
Health care execs are always under litigation. They are the named officers of their corporate units and therefore the legal representatives of their entities.
Private health care aggrieves hundreds to thousands of people a day. It’s rather someone who lost a loved one or who is in financial distress due to decisions made by this corporation than some deep dark conspiracy.
That doesn't align with the characteristics of a typical personal vendetta.