No, they get others to do it
there's also a difference between memorizing part of a line, and being able to extrapolate it.
Loose ties on the other hand lower the barrier for countries to initiate a war.
I'm not sure why people bring up that time as if it were somehow worse, turns out selling off all your public institutions to corporations at firesale prices isn't a good foundation for democracy. Many of those oligarchs that made out well became the powerbase of Putin, whom MI6 funded and supported.
The West creates its own monsters
India has better average wages than Russia.
I will die on this hill.
The game looks awesome though! I loved shovel knight and I think they'll knock it out of the park with this one too.
Commute time is a choice against other expenses. I live 10 minutes from the office because I didn't want to commute. I don't begrudge you for living further but I will say it was a WLB choice the employee made, not the employer.
This is an unpersuasive argument because it ignores all the computer users who are not "members". Whether or not "members" trust LinkedIn should have no bearning on whether other computer users who may or may not be "members" can retrieve others' public information.
Even more, this statement does not decry so-called scraping only "unauthorised" scraping. Who provides "authorisation". Surely not the LinkedIn members.
It is presumptuous if not ridiculous for "tech" companies to claim computer users "trust" them. Most of these companies recieve no feedback from the majority of their "members". Tech companies generally have no "customer service" for the members they target with data collection.
Further, there is an absence of meaningful choice. It is like saying people "trust" credit bureaus with their information. History shows these data collection intermediaries could not be trusted and that is why Americans have the Fair Credit Reporting Act.