Readit News logoReadit News
hilbert42 commented on Pine nuts and goat's milk should get allergy labels, say experts   bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c... · Posted by u/ljf
hilbert42 · 4 days ago
When I was a kid quite some decades ago I'd never heard of anyone with a food allergy. I'm not saying that food allergies didn't exist, it's just that in my circle—family, acquaintances, schoolfriends, radio, TV newspapers, etc. the subject was either never thought of or mentioned let alone discussed.

But we had heard of a few unfortunates who suffered hay fever in spring and some who had asthma but no one that I knew had these complaints. (Also, we had heard of people who'd gotten ill after being stung by bees.)

Let me illustrate how times have changed. At school, we'd swap peanut butter sandwiches without so much as a thought, teachers never mentioned allergies let alone warn about the dangers of swapping sandwiches.

One of the pleasures of going to Saturday arvo movie matinées was to share peanuts and peanut brittle which where I grew up was almost as popular as popcorn. Again, we'd never heard of anyone becoming ill from eating peanuts.

I have no knowledge of being allergic to any food, if I am then my response is so mild I'm unaware of it.

Similarly, these days I'm rather bemused when asked to wait 15 minutes after getting a flu or COVID shot in case I suffer an allergic reaction. I recall the mass school vaccinations against polio. We had 1000+ kids vaccinated between morning tea break and lunchtime—and there was no mention of allergic reactions and no one got sick (except of course for the small cadre of boys who suggested they miss the next class because their arms were sore—and no, they weren't excused).

Same with the army, you'd get multiple shots one after the other and there was no mucking about afterwards.

When someone of my vintage hears of all these allergies and the large numbers suffering from them one's first reaction is to think these poor delicate petals must be grossly exaggerating but clearly they're not.

It's clear that over the last 40—50 years something has changed dramatically. We've gone from something that was essentially unknown in the public consciousness to a well-known serious health issue that's now a problem for many people.

hilbert42 commented on China Is Run by Engineers, and the US by Too Many Lawyers   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
insane_dreamer · 8 days ago
The problem is that it’s more of a dictatorship now with Xi than it was after Deng. It’s not longer the best and brightest but those loyal to Xi. That’s how you got highly capable people like Li Keqiang sidelined and many others purged altogether on “corruption “ charges. A benevolent dictator can be beneficial for a country in crisis (the original Roman idea of a dictator which was a temporary position), like you could argue Deng was, but it’s not a good model for long-term governance.
hilbert42 · 8 days ago
"The problem is that it’s more of a dictatorship now with Xi than it was after Deng."

Despite what I said that's very true. Throughout history we've seen many dictators who've had both some degree of benevolence and the best interests of their states at heart only to be followed by tyrants or idiots (right, Rome's one example).

As you say, it’s not a good model for long-term governance. Unfortunately, benevolent dictators are a rare breed.

With China, the key question for the world is whether the country will become increasingly authoritarian and all that's likely to entail, or over time settle down and become more benign without major disruption, revolution and or war. The fact that authoritarianism seems to be on the rise generally doesn't bode well, methinks.

hilbert42 commented on China Is Run by Engineers, and the US by Too Many Lawyers   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/JumpCrisscross
ronsor · 8 days ago
It's awfully bold to claim that the US is obsessed with making rules, and China isn't. China is similarly full of rules (in fact, likely moreso), but they have less rule of law, so they aren't enforced consistently. The US has more rule of law (for now), so enforcement is (was) more consistent.

And of course, if anyone's too good at making rules, it's the EU.

hilbert42 · 8 days ago
"It's awfully bold to claim that the US is obsessed with making rules, and China isn't."

Of course China is obsessed with rules just like many countries are, and it's pretty clear it firmly polices its laws.

The difference is that after the death of Mao in 1976 Deng Xiaoping consciously and openly embarked on a task to pull China into the modern technological era, and to do that he deliberately set out to populate China's Politburo with highly educated engineers and like. (I gave references to this in a HN post a short while ago.)

Thus, for nearly 50 years China has been run by the best brains available rather than those who've the gift of the gab and promise the electorate whatever it takes to get them elected.

Sure that's not democracy and many of us in the West find it irksome. However, like it or not, over the last 50 years China's rulers have run a command economy and worked an economic miracle.

Deng Xiaoping's insight of getting the best and brightest to run the country was brilliant, unlike most dictators he chose a course of action that actually benefited China. There's no question about that, the evidence is there for all the world to see.

hilbert42 commented on Microsoft keeps adding stuff into Windows we don't need   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/rntn
v9v · 8 days ago
Please read the "Significance" section of the Wikipedia article you linked. It shows that your claim that this is a legal requirement isn't as clear-cut as you make it to be.
hilbert42 · 8 days ago
"...this is a legal requirement isn't as clear-cut as you make it to be."

The legal legal requirement can be questioned but heaven help the modern CEO that doesn't abide by the shareholders-first ethos. Before the 1980s (before Thatcher, Reagan, Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek et al era) companies had an understanding that they had a responsibility to both shareholders and the community that they operated in.

That latter notion is long since dead.

hilbert42 commented on Microsoft keeps adding stuff into Windows we don't need   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/rntn
SnuffBox · 8 days ago
I still use Windows 2k machines for Photoshop and other old Adobe tools that didn't have much in the way of DRM. It's an operating system that respects the user, it doesn't act as a babysitter.
hilbert42 · 8 days ago
And I still have a W2K machine that I use for offline tasks, some are software related (compatibility), others support older hardware that's still functional (back then, forced/planned obsolescence wasn't quite as bigger deal). I've my ancient HP LJ-III printer connected to the PC via its parallel port.
hilbert42 commented on Microsoft keeps adding stuff into Windows we don't need   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/rntn
linguae · 9 days ago
I wish Microsoft reverted to its 1990s style of making tools for power users that don’t get in the way. Windows 2000 was peak Windows to me. Security issues aside, it was a solid OS. It also had a non-flashy interface that got out of my way. No annoying notifications, no distractions: just pure Windows. Windows 2000 respected the user.

Today’s versions of Windows seem less respectful of the user. Microsoft is treating Windows as a platform to advertise Microsoft’s products rather than as strictly a productivity tool. Even if a lot of users these days use computers more like entertainment and communication devices rather than productivity tools, software should still get out of the user’s way. Software should shut up and do what the user commands.

Unfortunately there are other software systems that have the same philosophy. Google constantly nags me regarding logging in and switching to Chrome. Even macOS has gotten a lot more nag screens in the past decade compared to the glory years of Jobs-era Mac OS X.

It’s amazing how so many organizations are dependent on Windows, macOS, and Google for their productivity, yet these platforms have become more annoying to use over the years, becoming impediments to productivity.

hilbert42 · 8 days ago
"Windows 2000 was peak Windows to me."

Exactly the same here (and I've said so many times over the past 20 or so years). Sure, the W2K UI could be tarted up a little bit but no major functional changes. With security and hardware updates I'd be completely happy.

Microsoft's behavior forced me into migrating to Linux (and in that I'm not alone).

hilbert42 commented on German court throws book at ad blockers   theregister.com/2025/08/1... · Posted by u/BallsInIt
hilbert42 · 9 days ago
Why would the status of ad blocking be any different now from when copyright laws were originally framed (which was well before the internet)?

I could always skip ads in, say, magazines and newspapers and just concentrate on the content and I still do. In fact I've become very adroit at it, I can read a mag from cover to cover without being able to recall the content of any ad.

Copyright law was framed in an era when it was just not possible for advertisers to actually interfere and interrupt a reader's train of thought/reading pattern. Of course, their aim was to distract readers' attention but they couldn't force readers to actually read ads.

Nowadays, ads not only regularly interfere with the reading of content but they cause many adverse effects that were not possible in the days of printed material—spying on reader's privacy, slowing page loading (a reader's reading), being vehicles for malware and a rich source of illicit data for sleazy data brokers, etc.

It seems that there's no end to the inventiveness of those who wish to pervert the law. The fact that this matter has got as far as it has in German courts one has to wonder the motives of those in the court system. It would be interesting to see how many within that legal system have shares in ad and data broker companies.

I for one would ignore any such ban. Fact is, I do not use a dedicated ad blocker per se but take other measure such as using blocking lists in combo with blocking JS, etc. and my web browsing experience is essentially ad-free.

If the Law were to deem my actions unlawful then I'd posit that'd be sure evidence of a totalitarian state at work.

hilbert42 commented on A spellchecker used to be a major feat of software engineering (2008)   prog21.dadgum.com/29.html... · Posted by u/Bogdanp
hilbert42 · 12 days ago
"A Spellchecker Used to Be a Major Feat of Software Engineering"

It still is. The spell checker on my Android phone is a PIA. It's too dumb to correct many typos, there's no way of highlighting wrongly used but correct words such a 'fro' and 'for', etc. There's no automatic or user defined substitution such as correcting 'rhe' with 'the' and yet keep the words highlighted until a final revision.

Wordpossessor spellers have no way of tagging certain words that one may or may not wish to use depending on context. A classic example that's caught me out past the draft and found its way into the final document without me noticing it is 'pubic' for 'public'. Why doesn't my speller highlight such words in red and ask whether I actually meant to use this word?

Moreover, spellers are not all of the same level of accuracy, for example Microsoft Word's speller is much better than LibrOffice's much to my annoyance as LibreOffice is my main (preferred) WP.

Nor is there a method of collecting misspelled words or typos and tagging them as spelling errors or typos for the purpose of helping one's spelling or typing. It'd be nice to have a list of my misspelled words together with their correct spelling, that way I could become a better speller. Also, spellers could be integrated with full dictionaries—highlight the word and press F1 for its meaning, etc.

There are no dictionary formats that are both universal and smart, that is that would allow for easy amalgamation between dictionaries and yet could contain user defined words and other user metadata which would be distinguished from the general corpus of words when crossed or amalgamated. For example, a smart dictionary format could contain metadata that would allow a dictionary and thesaurus to coexist in the same word list, similarly so different dictionaries, technical, medical etc.

All up, spellercheckers are still a damn mess. They need urgent attention.

hilbert42 commented on Why leather is best motorcycle protection [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=xwuRU... · Posted by u/lifeisstillgood
snozolli · 21 days ago
You are obviously a motorcyclist.

And so it's OK for motorcyclists to disobey road rules on a public street and be inconsiderate to others?

How about you answer the question that I asked instead of whatever this nonsense is?

being in a safely parked car with the ignition switched off and doing something doesn't count or constitute as being inattentive

You ran into a motorcycle because you weren't paying attention. You're in control of your vehicle and you're responsible for being aware of your surroundings. I use many types of vehicles and I have never, ever run into one.

It's your comment that's ironic

Nope, you're just so unaware that it doesn't even occur to you that you're failing in your responsibility as the operator of a vehicle. Also, you still haven't explained what a "wrong side" is.

hilbert42 · 12 days ago
"Also, you still haven't explained what a "wrong side" is."

Come on, I'm not that stupid as to be baited further.

hilbert42 commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
ExoticPearTree · 13 days ago
> The law was passed by the previous government and everyone assumed the next government would take great delight in reversing it.

Unless a law is a mortal threat to the current party in power, it will not be repelled. Even so most likely they will try to wash it down instead of actually abolishing it.

hilbert42 · 12 days ago
"Unless a law is a mortal threat to the current party in power, it will not be repelled."

Trouble is, like the frog in warming water, the UK is by a series of steps falling into ever-increasing irrelevancy on the world stage. By the time it wakes up to the fact it'll be too late.

u/hilbert42

KarmaCake day5094March 21, 2017View Original