Readit News logoReadit News
hibikir commented on The highest quality codebase   gricha.dev/blog/the-highe... · Posted by u/Gricha
wahnfrieden · 3 days ago
I believe wage work has a significant factor in all this.

Most are not paid for results, they're paid for time at desk and regular responsibilities such as making commits, delivering status updates, code reviews, etc. - the daily activities of work are monitored more closely than the output. Most ESOP grant such little equity that working harder could never observably drive an increase in its value. Getting a project done faster just means another project to begin sooner.

Naturally workers will begin to prefer the motions of the work they find satisfying more than the result it has for the business's bottom line, from which they're alienated.

hibikir · 2 days ago
It gets worse than that: You can possibly get rewarded based on your manager's goals, or maybe your skip level's, but that doesn't necessarily have to line up all that well with more serious business goals. I am sure I am not the only one that had to help initiatives that I thought would be, at best, just wasteful to the business, or that we could get 80% of the value with 20% of the efforts. But it's ultimately about the person who writes the review.

This gets us to the rule number one of being successful at a job: Make sure your manager likes you. Get 8 layers of people whose priority is just to be sure their manager likes them, and what is getting done is very unlikely to have much to do with shareholder value, customer happiness, or anything like that.

hibikir commented on Gundam is just the same as Jane Austen but happens to include giant mech suits   eli.li/gundam-is-just-the... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
expedition32 · 4 days ago
Yeah original Gundam is about a never ending war in which the protagonists are just cogs in the machine. And it turns out every side is led by immoral scumbags.
hibikir · 4 days ago
Yep, and splatter around some talk about the horrors of being a combatant in those wars, as if you don't fight, your loved ones die anyway. You can see how Evangelion is doing a lot of riffing on Gundam. In some ways it's not Jane Austen, it's Full Metal Jacket, or Rambo: First Blood. The different series might have giant robots all over the place, but there aer serious stories barely hidden underneath.

Even when a story starts as mostly lighthearted adolescent fare (see, The Witch of Mercury), it tends to end in trauma, injustice and many war crimes.

hibikir commented on New benchmark shows top LLMs struggle in real mental health care   swordhealth.com/newsroom/... · Posted by u/RicardoRei
everdrive · 4 days ago
I heard a story on NPR the other day, and the attitude seems to be that it's totally inevitable that LLMs _will_ be providing mental health care, so our task must be to apply the right guardrails.

I'm not even sure what to say. It's self-evidently a terrible idea, but we all just seem to be charging full-steam ahead like so many awful ideas in the past couple of decades.

hibikir · 4 days ago
Forget about calling it mental healthcare or not: Most people end up dealing with people in significant distress at one point or another. Many do it all the time even when they aren't trained or getting paid as mental health professionals, just because of circumstances. You don't need a clinical setting for someone to tell you that they have suicidal ideation, or to be stuck interacting with someone in a crisis situation. We don't train every adult in this, but the more you have to do it, the more you have to learn some tools for at least doing little harm.

We can see an LLM as someone that talks with more people, for more time, than anyone on earth talks in their lifetime. So they are due to be in constant contact with people in mental distress. At that point, you might as well consider the importance of giving them the skills of a mental health professonal, because they are going to be facing more of this than a priest in a confessional. And this is true whether someone says "Gemini, pretend that you are a psychologist" or not. You or I don't need a prompt to know we need to notice when someone is in a severe psychotic episode: Some level of mental health awareness is built in, if just to protect ourselves. So an LLM needs quite a bit of this by default to avoid being really harmful. And once you give it that, you might as well evaluate it against professionals: Not because it must be as good, but because it'd be really nice if it was, even when it's not trying to act as one.

hibikir commented on So you want to speak at software conferences?   dylanbeattie.net/2025/12/... · Posted by u/speckx
hibikir · 5 days ago
He's pretty right on the "get bored" bits. I have few friends that are doing a lot of conferences every year after, say, year 6, and they are people whose circumstances lead them to not wanting to spend much time at home, for one reason or another. At that point it's like a job with 30% travel: You either have few attachments, or are trying to avoid the ones you have.
hibikir commented on Why are 38 percent of Stanford students saying they're disabled?   reason.com/2025/12/04/why... · Posted by u/delichon
hibikir · 10 days ago
I think there's a non-malicious explanation for a percentage of this.

As I grew up in the 80s, there were two kinds of gifted kids in school: The kind that would ace everything anyway, and the kind that, for a variety of reasons, lacked the regulation abilities to manage the school setting well, with the slow classes and such. A lot of very smart people just failed academically, because the system didn't work for them. Some of those improved their executive function enough as they went past their teenage years, and are now making a lot of money in difficult fields.

So what happens when we do make accomodations to them? That their peaky, gifted performance comes out, they don't get ejected by the school systems anywhere near as often as they were before, and now end up in top institutions. Because they really are both very smart and disabled at the same time.

you can even see this in tech workplaces: The percentages of workers that are neurodivergent is much higher than usual, but it's not as if tech hires them out of compassion, but because there's a big cadre or neurodivergent people that are just in the line where they are very productive workers anyway. So it should be no surprise that in instutitutions searching for performance, the number of people that qualify for affordances for certain mental disabilities just goes way up.

That's not to say that there cannot be people that are just cheating, but it doesn't take much time in a class with gifted kids to realize that no, it's not just cheating. You can find someone, say, suffering in a dialectic-centric english class, where just following the conversation is a problem, while they are outright bored with the highest difficulty technical AP classes available, because they find them very easy.

hibikir commented on Micron Announces Exit from Crucial Consumer Business   investors.micron.com/news... · Posted by u/simlevesque
mh- · 10 days ago
I'm curious where you live. Anecdotally, this is the opposite to the experience of everyone I know.
hibikir · 10 days ago
In many cities in the US, there's Microcenter, where you can walk out with every part you need. We also still have smaller stores that can build clones for you/hand you the boxes, but they don't quite have the same variety of parts.
hibikir commented on Mapping the US healthcare system’s financial flows   healthisotherpeople.subst... · Posted by u/brandonb
bombcar · 11 days ago
We've unwound industries before - if we have the political will we can do amazing things.

But the people in and using those industries have no desire to change so anything that does happen is likely to occur slowly from expansion - e.g, bringing Medicare to earlier and more people, and expand children coverage, etc.

hibikir · 11 days ago
Those are probably the easiest levels for simplification, but I'd expect significant pushback anyway. Something like start medicare at 55 would be a huge difference to most providers, just due to changes in reimbursement.
hibikir commented on Mapping the US healthcare system’s financial flows   healthisotherpeople.subst... · Posted by u/brandonb
bombcar · 11 days ago
Here's an idea. If other countries can provide healthcare for much less per patient, why can't they sell that to Americans?

In other words, allow US citizens to "opt out" of the US healthcare system and participate in the German one? You'd have to make some allowances for replacing taxes with costs, billing, and allow "German" healthcare to operate in the US ...

hibikir · 11 days ago
Basically every bit of the current system, from how much people are paid to how a hospital looks like, is a side effect of the way we pay for healthcare, and the way we decide which provider to select. So we cannot just wave a magic wand and get the German system, as a whole lot of capital decisions are now just straight out wrong.

We see similar things in education. People wonder how many European systems are cheaper than US universities: Well, it's very easy to see once you attend a university in Spain and then one in the US. The shape of the university, from facilities to salaries to class sizes, make them look like completely different organisms, even though 18 year olds come in from one side and come out with degrees in the other. And note that this is also connected to healthcare: How many doctors do we train, or bring in from other countries? How many years do they spend training, and how much debt do they incur getting training? How much are they going to ask in pay just to handle that debt?

Changing the US system is a very good idea, but the changes would be very traumatic to most people working for the system, or invested in the system. All of them would lobby against changes that make their lives worse, and therefore makes legislature that makes the change happen very difficult to pass.

hibikir commented on The Origins of Scala (2009)   artima.com/articles/the-o... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
blandflakes · 15 days ago
They really obliterated their momentum with how they went about Scala 3, unfortunately.
hibikir · 14 days ago
It was before this: It was never a huge community, but from very early on it was split thanks to some rather unfriendly, competitive personalities and very different goals. You didn't just use scala: you either ran scala with a Twitter stack, or a typesafe(now lightbend) stack, or a scalaz stack, or a cats stack, or a zip stack. And a lot of the people developing each stack didn't like each other. I've gotten to work with core contributors of multiple of those, and knowing that I wasn't a devotee of any stack led to hearing way to much complaining in pairing sessions about how The Others (TM) were slowing down the adoption of the language.

A language that is really popular can manage having 5 ways to do things, but a small community is just going to lose steam. And the fact is, all the ways work just fine in a vacuum, but you can't just get really mature tooling when everything is just so split.

hibikir commented on How good engineers write bad code at big companies   seangoedecke.com/bad-code... · Posted by u/gfysfm
asdfman123 · 16 days ago
No, big tech engineers are highly motivated. There's lots of money, good management, and plenty of incentive. (I'm a Google engineer myself).

The problem I observe is a fairly universal one: management doesn't care about good code, it cares about results.

It's generally hard for anyone without specific experience with a codebase to tell what you're doing with it. Management can't evaluate the value of maintenance work, so it doesn't value it at all.

People who ship sloppy code get promoted.

hibikir · 16 days ago
It's interesting that you talk that there's a lot of good management, followed by a list of things I'd call bad management: Forget about good vs bad code, of course that's unimportant. But insufficient maintenance that causes lower velocity on the next set of changes matters. Good engineering will tell you when the issue isn't just about code that is ugly, but code that slows changes down so much you'd be better off improving it.

If you set incentives that say that being sloppy and leaving landmines for the next group of people is the way to get promoted, guess what? the management is bad. Often because they are also looking at their own self interest, and expect to leave the consequences to whoever comes after them. This isn't new to big tech: You'll find this all described in books about corporate dysfunction written in the 90s.

It's all traditional principal agent problems, which just get worse and worse as you add layers of management, as the principal has agents upon agents underneath, all using the misaligned incentives. One either wants t avoid getting fired while doing the minimum, or sacrifice the health of what is around them for a good enough promotion packet/review. And since there's no reasonable way for individual objectives to align well with long term objectives, people leave landmines. When there's enough landmines everywhere, you are always better off in greenfield development. And at that point, doing any maintenance, or being stuck in a project that isn't getting fed a bunch of capital to grow it is career suicide. All about bad incentives, set by bad management.

u/hibikir

KarmaCake day5918March 9, 2014
About
Twitter: hibikir1
View Original