words_on_lines = [ret for line in text.splitlines() for ret in [line.split()]]
Readit NewsDask for python satisfies exactly these requirements, just in the python ecosystem. A pattern I have been using at multiple workplaces for the last decade was to start a dask cluster (maybe 10 years ago I would start an ipyparallel cluster) on any node that does computation, then as I needed I would spin new nodes and connect them. This gives dynamic infinite scalability, with almost no overhead or even code debt - the dask interfaces are great even without using distributed computing.
When I wasn't allowed to use containers, I would sneakily add code to other machines to join my dask clusters. I would connect any and all computing devices.
One company pushed us to use databricks and spark, and I never got it - why would we commit to a cluster size before we started a computation?
Sorry but what's the difference between this and C14[1] dating?
The innovation is to find traces of a global cosmic-ray event with which to connect the dating of objects in one local area, Greece, where the dendrochronological data is not continuous, with those in far away local areas, for example England/Ireland, where we have continuous dendrochronological data
it sounds minor, but having `from` before `select` means you can get autocomplete
I get the sentiment, but personally I can easily imagine myself writing an autocompleter that would work fine with select before from. (I don't write much sql so I don't)
Just to clarify, my point is that when we do write sql most of us start by writing the from part, and even if we didn't I can just offer all columns from all tables I know about with some heuristic for their order when autocompleting in the select part.
How can I unread this?
What's the complexity of computing the nth fibonacci number? Make a graph of computation time with n=1..300 that visualizes your answer.
There are those that very quickly reply linear but admit they can't get a graph to corroborate, and there are those that very quickly say linear and even produce the graph! (though not correct fibonacci numbers...)