Big shout out to Generative.fm as well!
Big shout out to Generative.fm as well!
I am on Google to find results to my questions - I want the quickest exit and that's what they provide. If they fail to do that they back down trust me, these guys watch "the numbers" carefully.
1. There are 20-50 year olds with pre-existing conditions such as asthma who are at higher risk. For example, a colleague on my team has asthma. Another colleague on my team has a husband who has asthma. As a Manager, I can't ask either of them to come into work.
2. What about 20-50 year olds who come in contact with 50+ year old or live together with them? They may be at low risk, but they will definitely spread the virus around more
It becomes quite complicated dealing with these things on a case by case basis.
Basically, you and your auditor work together to come up with an overly complex set of rules that somewhat meets the requirements, then your auditor brings in a bunch of consultants to help you implement their rules, which usually just means checking a lot of boxes, and then everyone calls it a day.
So really all it does is create a lot of work for a lot of people for very little gain. In a lot of cases we were going to do some of that stuff anyway, but now we had to slow down and show the auditor all the work. An auditor who usually doesn't care -- all they want to do is be able to say "yep I watched their presentation on this".
So I was quite surprised by the headline, that the auditor firms would want to roll it back. It's basically just a huge money maker for them.
And then I saw what they want to change -- they want to make the rules looser on how the auditors are audited. Basically they want to be able to keep being lazy.
SOX had great intentions but was one of the most poorly implemented regulations ever.
1. It took me probably 30 seconds to understand that the text blocks on the start page are summaries of what's in every chapter. Try to read this without knowing that this website is an online book:
> The purpose of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, the difference between frameworks and languages, and finding your way around a basic website project with Atom.
This doesn't make any sense if you don't know that it describes a chapter in a book.
2. Simplify sentences. Cut adjectives. Shorten. It reads academic. Examples:
> Our goal is to make it as easy as possible for complete beginners to become professional web developers, so if you’ve never written a line of HTML or CSS, but you’re contemplating a career shift, grab a cup of coffee, take a seat, and let’s get to work.
This is a single sentence. It's hard to understand. Your readers aren't all native Americans. This could be turned into:
-> This guide helps you to become a professional web developer, even if you've never written a single line of HTML or CSS.
> They’re very closely related, but they’re also designed for very specific tasks. Understanding how they interact will go a long way towards becoming a web developer.
Ctrl + F "very": Too often.
A good editor might reduce the text by 25-50%. My secret tip is the Material Design Writing guide [1]. It shows how to write for apps. With apps, the user needs to get a task done as fast and efficient as possible. Write that way.
Why on earth would you re-use the same term when naming two things with similar (thus easily confused) consumer-visible attributes but completely different security guarantees?!
Google backs off on previously announced Allo privacy feature (http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/21/12994362/allo-privacy-mess...)
Performance for privacy - LOL
Do you have a source for this part?
Do you have a source for this as well please?
https://www.terraform.io/docs/cloud/cost-estimation/index.ht...