Readit News logoReadit News
gibba999 commented on Packages dumped in wrong lobby, resident tried harder to correct it than Amazon   cambridgeday.com/2021/11/... · Posted by u/ilamont
hef19898 · 4 years ago
Reverse logistics suck. Sure, once stuff is in the network of, say, FedEx, per-mile costs are comparable. Thing start to become more expensive from the point the returns arrive at an (Amazon) warehouse:

- stuff isn't packed as good as from the supplier - stuff has to be unpacked, checked, graded, re-packed, re-labelled and re-stored - stuff isn't delivered in bulk, it is delivered in small, more often tan not, single-unit quantities making goods receipt and in-bound ops more expensive

No idea if it is 20x, but it is considerably more expensive.

gibba999 · 4 years ago
My experience is that one-off human costs tend to be extreme for exceptions at big organizations.

Handling exceptions might require a business day or two of admin time just to handle the baseline exception. Multiply 16 hours by salary, and you're at big bucks.

Plus, you need processes for oversight. That costs /a lot/ more. Ownership sounds great on paper -- where any support rep can grant an exception -- but in practice, that gradually leads to a culture of abuse. It starts little, and once that's part of the culture, increases over time.

gibba999 commented on Intel CEO Cites Brexit as Reason for Chip Fab Plans in UK Not an Option   techpowerup.com/287574/in... · Posted by u/WithinReason
jl6 · 4 years ago
I also wouldn’t want to make a huge $multi-billion commitment to a country still shaking out its new trade, labor, and regulatory environment.

If Brexit becomes a permanent state of crisis, the UK will cease to attract inward investment.

On the other hand, if what we are currently seeing is just the teething pains of the new order combined with the post-pandemic-supply-chain-reboot, then I expect the UK will return to being a known quantity and more or less business as usual.

gibba999 · 4 years ago
Even without the crisis, what upside does the UK have over the EU proper?

I feel like the UK was competitive when it was competing with European countries. Competing with countries in the EU? I just have no idea why anyone would invest in businesses there. It just feels like an inferior option, unless labor costs fall like a rock.

I think over time, the deals the UK gets will get worse and worse, not just on investment, but on everything.

It doesn't help that China still thinks of opium wars when the UK comes up, India things of the British Empire, and much of the rest of the world feels the same way. The UK was always respected, but never loved. If that respect goes away...

gibba999 commented on YouTube Bans Ron Paul Institute   twitter.com/RonPaul/statu... · Posted by u/thereare5lights
AnEro · 4 years ago
> chilling effect it had on free speech

I think comparing this to free speech is just a losing argument cause legally free speech is for criticizing the government non-violently.

They are private companies that have a monopoly, making a new platform focused on enabling creator's means of revenue is the ideal approach.

>If a liberal channel is wrongly banned, an army of Googlers quickly rushes to fix it. If a conservative channel is wrongly banned, there's internal snickering.

Conservatives unironically have a victim complex for this because lefties have the same issue because they are saying the centerist thing. Democrats or what conservatives call 'liberal' right now are mostly a centerist party, trying to be palatable to the largest audience. The same social media companies want to keep the largest ad consumer base as well as advertiser pool.

> another darker side of this

I honestly think it is a societal shift of the vanilla of politics, I'm sorry conservatism is no longer vanilla and is actually the rocky road of politics and isn't as friendly.

Edit: I challenge anyone offended by this point of view, to look into conservatives that have been 'cancelled'/'silenced' viewership and numbers before and after. It usually helps them get more of a following across the board, they inflate this issue beyond how bad it is to get more attention for a possible loss in revenue.

gibba999 · 4 years ago
I don't care about "legally." I care about whether we live in a society where we have diverse opinions, and people feel free to express themselves. If we have a system where:

- Market forces drive companies to support one point of view in media, and censor everything else;

- Market forces drive everyone to work under draconian NDAs; and

- Market forces drive companies not to hire people who engage in WrongThink

We've got a broken system where no one has free speech, no matter what the laws say.

And no, you can't successfully start a competing company, because market forces mean that companies which optimize to market forces win.

I don't care about conservatives, liberals, or victim complexes. I care about having reason discourse, civic debate, and free speech. If a social, political, and economic system doesn't allow that, we've got a broken system. As a footnote, every conservative I've spoken to thinks I'm a leftwing nutjob, and every liberal, a rightwing nutjob. If you disagree with either party line on anything (even not in the opposing direction), that's how you're viewed. The polarization and stereotyping is crazy.

gibba999 commented on YouTube Bans Ron Paul Institute   twitter.com/RonPaul/statu... · Posted by u/thereare5lights
AnEro · 4 years ago
Comparing messy AI that will demonetize/remove historic retellings of traumatic events, wars, and hate crimes to 'censoring' Ron Paul is ridiculous.

Most of them moved to because of demonetization... Where swearing can demonetize a video as well as mentioning rape or murder in contexts explicitly. Yes that is horrible to punish literal historians talking about these events that really happened that we should be educated on but, how do you separate those from actually hateful content so charmin/coke/corporation still will pay you to run ads?

Letting people think the vaccine is dangerous without scientific proof when they could die without it, isn't government regulation friendly.

edit: to day I learned there's a down vote feature lol. Didn't know acknowledging a private company has interests beyond letting people saying w/e when want when it can negatively impact their bottom line would be so controversial. Also banning him for being conservative is very different from banning spreading vaccine misinformation. Then grouping that with removing historians incomes due to messy AI implementation to save YouTube's ad friendliness to keep their bottom line is just a victim complex.

gibba999 · 4 years ago
If it's just AI, you separate them with actual human oversight.

From what I understand, they moved less because of demonetization, and more because of the chilling effect it had on free speech. They needed to be super-careful in script writing to make sure they didn't anger the YouTube algorithm.

I'll also mention another darker side of this: Google is almost entirely liberal inside. If a liberal channel is wrongly banned, an army of Googlers quickly rushes to fix it. If a conservative channel is wrongly banned, there's internal snickering. AIs are not neutral, and Google's reflects the biases of the people who keep tweaking it.

gibba999 commented on YouTube Bans Ron Paul Institute   twitter.com/RonPaul/statu... · Posted by u/thereare5lights
xupybd · 4 years ago
The banning of politicians from any public platform raises questions about the level of influence these platforms hold and their impact on democracy. I'm not sure where things will land but this is a bold move by YouTube. I'm surprised they picked Ron Paul to test this on.
gibba999 · 4 years ago
They didn't pick Ron Paul to test this on, and it's not a bold move. YouTube has been in the censorship game for a long, long time.

A lot of content creators -- of documentaries -- created Nebula because they were sick and tired of getting censored.

https://nebula.app/videos?category=history

These aren't wackos. These are mostly serious scholars, tired of a serious problem with Google. I'm giving this as an example; this has been a problem for a lot of people for a long time.

gibba999 commented on YouTube Bans Ron Paul Institute   twitter.com/RonPaul/statu... · Posted by u/thereare5lights
gibba999 · 4 years ago
This is sad.

As much as I'm offended by many of the things Ron Paul does and stands for, I'm glad he's there. There's a lot of divergent thinking there. Outliers are good. I'd be terrified of a congress with a dozen Ron Pauls, but one is good to have around.

If I had my druthers, we'd have one of him in Congress. And one of each other extremist point of view, left-wing, right-wing, or just off in another direction.

gibba999 commented on Companies should probably pay $2k per person for open source (2017)   gratipay.news/your-compan... · Posted by u/mattbk1
gibba999 · 4 years ago
* Well, the links on the front page point somewhere random -- to a clipart site.

* There's nothing about who is doing this or why.

* There's no way to actually pay that I could find.

* There's no information about overhead, or if the GratiPay is pocketing the money.

It's just a half-baked half-finished web page. I think a good not-for-profit here might be helpful? But I'm not sure how to structure it so that it is. I don't see why a business would actually want to pay. Most managers believe they have a fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value. This doesn't help.

And the money raised? I'm not sure a serious analysis has been done by anyone. As an open source author, I'm not inclined to even deposit a $0.32 royalty check.

gibba999 commented on YouTube is banning anti-vaccine activists and blocking all anti-vaccine content   washingtonpost.com/techno... · Posted by u/danso
NoraCodes · 4 years ago
Why would YouTube recommend videos from people you're subscribed to? You already have a reliable feed of those videos on the subscriptions feed. They are trying to get you to subscribe to other channels to increase your watch time.
gibba999 · 4 years ago
Youtube doesn't give me a reliable feed of my subscriptions. If I haven't watched something in a few months, it's basically dead to the algorithm.

This is obnoxious since I tend to watch series of documentaries, and I prefer to watch many episodes in a row. Stuff just poofs out of existence.

gibba999 commented on False Pro-China Accounts Invade Twitter in the UK   bitterwinter.org/pro-ccp-... · Posted by u/whitehind
chrisjc · 4 years ago
> The antivax/antimask/etc. movements as social media manipulation in preparation for a bioweapon

Not what I was saying, so apologies if that's how it reads. I'm saying very passive "bioweapons" could be used to cause stress, increase societal friction, disrupt normality, etc over extended periods of time... effectively destabilizing societies from within, causing governments to take their eyes off the ball, letting down their guard, etc...

What's interesting is that the government (forget which department and paper) did have a plan. They had accounted for this scenario. But I guess there's a chasm between having a plan and being able to put it into practice.

What is "epi"?

gibba999 · 4 years ago
Epidemiology.

Different scientific communities use different scientific methods, and often come to vastly different conclusions as a result. Epi, and related communities, uses frequentist statistical methods. It's an interesting dynamic when two communities have research methods which fundamentally conflict.

gibba999 commented on False Pro-China Accounts Invade Twitter in the UK   bitterwinter.org/pro-ccp-... · Posted by u/whitehind
chrisjc · 4 years ago
Agreed.

Whether a relatively paltry (harmless compared to conventional bioweapons) virus like COVID was ever considered as a weapon hardly matters at this point. What really scares the absolute poop out of me is that the west has shown its hand, and exposed stress fractures that could easily be exploited by foreign actors.

I'd say that the lines between what you have delineated as first and second cheapest attacks are obscure. Cyber/bio/etc attacks are now a means of accomplishing "informational" attacks.

Perhaps I've been deceived by traditional and social media and the scale of antivax, QAnon, MAGA movements are blown out of proportion, but if a foreign actor ever wanted to deliver a significant blow to the west, it would be to influence and exploitation of theses movements in very slow and deliberate ways. Effectively destabilizing and splintering western societies.

(It's not just the antivax/QAnon/MAGA movements that scare me either. In my opinion, anti-American whataboutist/hyper-socialist/pro-communist are just as concerning.)

Maybe this is already the case. Then again I might be no less paranoid than the followers of these movements.

I know I'm not the first to point this out and I'm only regurgitating what has already been stated, but I only see a few ways this will/can unfold. The west will...

- become more authoritarian to deal with the civilly insubordinate - descend into chaos and anarchy as influence dwindles - i dunno...

While western military defense remains unassailable, there is a huge gaping hole in its ability to deter non-conventionial aggression and encroachment.

gibba999 · 4 years ago
That's an interesting hypothesis: The antivax/antimask/etc. movements as social media manipulation in preparation for a bioweapon.

What's interesting is the dynamic between the epi community and the security community. I'm not sure if I'm naming those correctly:

* The security community does a lot of threat modeling (how might we be attacked? how might we have been attacked?), which is helpful. That doesn't suggest they believe those things actually happened.

* The epi community views this as coded language for believing in bizarre conspiracy theories.

u/gibba999

KarmaCake day524November 4, 2018View Original