> Unable to display PDF directly.
So :shrug:
Edit: Downloaded the pdf, started reading it. So much slop. I think something of value could be surfaced much earlier.
Readit Newserklik commented on Agentic Software Engineering Book agenticse-book.github.io/... · Posted by u/bananaflag
Deleted Comment
erklik commented on There were BGP anomalies during the Venezuela blackout loworbitsecurity.com/rada... · Posted by u/illithid0
Nuclear capability by itself isn't a complete deterrent. It has been widely reported that the US military has made contingency plans for a decapitation strike and seizure or destruction of nuclear weapons in Pakistan in case the situation turns really bad there. Real deterrence requires a credible second-strike capability on survivable platforms such as submarines.
> the US military has made contingency plans for a decapitation strike and seizure or destruction of nuclear weapons in Pakistan in case the situation turns really bad there. Real deterrence requires a credible second-strike capability on survivable platforms such as submarines.
The existence of a plan does not equate to the feasibility of its execution. A submarine-based deterrent is indeed the "gold standard" for survivability, but it is not the only standard. There is enough pain for the US that they wouldn't actually attack Pakistan.
erklik commented on The Rise of the Japanese Toilet nytimes.com/2025/05/29/bu... · Posted by u/Kaibeezy
I feel it’s weird defining them by the main religion of the country it is (maybe) mostly used. No one says the numbers used in English are Muslim, they are generally referred to as Arabic.
I wouldn’t say printing is a “catholic thing”, but it definitely came from a super catholic part of the world.
I think it makes sense specifically in this case.
Mainly because Islam has jurisprudence around hygiene in a sense. Ritual purification is an actual religious principle.
Islam requires Muslims to pray 5 times a day, and for those prayers, one has to be ritually clean. That involves washing the hands, rinsing the mouth and nose, washing the face, forearms, head, ears, and then the feet. That's effectively all the major parts of the body that are generally not covered by clothes. Your "cleanliness" is invalided if you use the toilet, pass flatulence, vomit, sleep and so on.
More so, for using the toilet, there are rules. You have to find a place that is away from standing water, people's pathways, shade etc ; granted, this generally doesn't apply in today's age. You have to be quiet on the toilet, and not look at anyone. Not allowed to eat any food while defecating. Lastly and most relevant in this case, you have to use water to wash yourself using the left hand, and then afterwards, you need to do the same for washing the front if you've urinated.
The reason why the "bidet spray" thing exists, is largely because of the rules in the religion around that practice. Calling them Arabic wouldn't make any sense because Indonesia, with the largest Muslim population, has similar tools in their facilities. Again, because they're mostly Muslims.
Printing isn't a catholic thing because the religious doctrine didn't emphasis "printing" itself.
Arabic numbers aren't "islamic numbers" because the religious doctrine didn't emphasise the numbers in some way.
erklik commented on Denmark to raise retirement age to 70 telegraph.co.uk/world-new... · Posted by u/wslh
Raising the birth rate is extremely difficult and immigration will destroy a country's culture if not managed properly.
For an interesting case study, compare Japan (who refuses to allow mass immigration and is at risk of going extinct) and the UK (who has embraced it and is on the way to becoming Muslim-majority). It'll be interesting to see in 50 years which one has had better outcomes.
> Raising the birth rate is extremely difficult
> the UK (who has embraced it and is on the way to becoming Muslim-majority)
.. Seems like we've found a fix for ;) I wonder what's the difference between Muslims in the UK vs Japanese folks.
Not sure if this is just me, but the second section with the dark background, seems to have very dark text.. It's effectively unreadable.
What we need, imo, is:
1. A new UX/UI paradigm. Writing prompts is dumb, re-writing prompts is even dumber. Chat interfaces suck.
2. "Magic" in the same way that Google felt like magic 25 years ago: a widget/app/thing that knows what you want to do before even you know what you want to do.
3. Learned behavior. It's ironic how even something like ChatGPT (it has hundreds of chats with me) barely knows anything about me & I constantly need to remind it of things.
4. Smart tool invocation. It's obvious that LLMs suck at logic/data/number crunching, but we have plenty of tools (like calculators or wikis) that don't. The fact that tool invocation is still in its infancy is a mistake. It should be at the forefront of every AI product.
5. Finally, we need PRODUCTS, not FEATURES; and this is exactly Pete's point. We need things that re-invent what it means to use AI in your product, not weirdly tacked-on features. Who's going to be the first team that builds an AI-powered operating system from scratch?
I'm working on this (and I'm sure many other people are as well). Last year, I worked on an MVP called Descartes[1][2] which was a spotlight-like OS widget. I'm re-working it this year after I had some friends and family test it out (and iterating on the idea of ditching the chat interface).
[1] https://vimeo.com/931907811
[2] https://dvt.name/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-11.png
> 1. A new UX/UI paradigm. Writing prompts is dumb, re-writing prompts is even dumber. Chat interfaces suck.
> 2. "Magic" in the same way that Google felt like magic 25 years ago: a widget/app/thing that knows what you want to do before even you know what you want to do.
and not to "dunk" on you or anything of the sort but that's literally what Descartes seems to be? Another wrapper where I am writing prompts telling the AI what to do.
erklik commented on Ahmed Mohamed Clock Incident en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahm... · Posted by u/carabiner
this story never made sense to me. he disassembled a digital clock then put the pieces in a pencil case? he didn't fabricate it or design any of the electronic components; what was he supposed to be demonstrating, that you can put a digital clock in new case? also his dad was a sudanese opposition politician??
It's a 14 year old kid. He wasn't demonstrating anything.
He took apart a clock, stuck in back in a different case, wanted to show his teacher that in a, I am guessing : "Hey look, I took all this apart, and managed not to destroy it"..
Honestly, this entire event shows me two things:
1. The jumps people make to crazy assumptions when faced with someone they don't like because of ideological reasons.
2. The low level of technological acumen/knowledge to assume that this is even similar to a dangerous device.
From the Show HN rules: "Off topic: blog posts, sign-up pages, newsletters, lists, and other reading material. Those can't be tried out, so can't be Show HNs. Make a regular submission instead."