Readit News logoReadit News
eholk commented on Vibe Coding in the 90s   ssg.dev/vibe-coding-in-th... · Posted by u/sedatk
marcodiego · 2 months ago
The closest to vibecoding in the 90's was to open Borland's Turbo C help in any page, copy and paste the example and modify it until you understand it or until it did what you wanted.

Microsoft Quick Basic help was also gold.

eholk · 2 months ago
You know, that's exactly how I learned to program.

I started up QBasic knowing nothing other than that it seemed like a thing for programming computers and programming seemed like a cool thing to do.

I typed in random words, and eventually I typed "screen". When I pushed enter, QBasic capitalized it, so it seemed important. I hit F1 and read the help. It made no sense, but the example ran and had other capitalized words so I could repeat the process.

Eventually I started making really terrible text-based Final Fantasy knock-offs.

eholk commented on Americans' love of billiards paved the way for synthetic plastics   invention.si.edu/inventio... · Posted by u/geox
crdrost · 2 months ago
Another place where you will frequently find celluloid is guitar picks. Can just slowly amass a collection for free. Especially if they're thin, flexy, especially if they've got wavy or trippy designs in the plastic, it's probably celluloid. This can be handy for survivalism -- you buy your first ferro-rod fire starter, if you're having trouble getting wood shavings to ignite, try mixing them with shavings of guitar pick and see if the explosive reaction helps. Other folks keep a jar of cotton balls coated in petroleum jelly for a similar quick-start, or egg cartons filled with sawdust and parrafin (although that's less for getting the spark to take and more for getting a log to start burning in a stove)... and of course if you don't want to just slowly accumulate unwanted guitar picks you can buy big sheets of celluloid for like 5-10 bucks.
eholk · 2 months ago
When we were teenagers, one of my friends lit a guitar pick on fire. It was a lot more exciting than we expected! We thought it'd just shrivel up and melt, but instead it was like the pick was made of solid rocket fuel.
eholk commented on I spent the day teaching seniors how to use an iPhone   forums.macrumors.com/thre... · Posted by u/dabinat
rzzzwilson · 2 months ago
There's a quote from Bjarne Stroustrup showing it's not just Seniors having trouble:

I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone.

eholk · 2 months ago
Bjarne Stroustrup is 74, so he probably counts as a senior too at this point, although surely more technically literate than the stereotypes.

Still, I'm in my early 40s and I find myself baffled when I help my mom with her iPhone. I've been an Android guy ever since that was an option.

eholk commented on A deep critique of AI 2027's bad timeline models   lesswrong.com/posts/PAYfm... · Posted by u/paulpauper
siddboots · 6 months ago
I think both approaches are useful. AI2027 presents a specific timeline in which a) the trajectory of tech is at least somewhat empirically grounded, and b) each step of the plot arc is plausible. There's a chance of it being convincing to a skeptic who had otherwise thought of the whole "rogue AI" scenario as a kind of magical thinking.
eholk · 6 months ago
For what it's worth, I've read both Bostrom's Superintelligence and AI 2027. Reading Superintelligence was interesting and for me really drove home how hard setting aligned goals for an AI is, but the timelines seemed far enough out that it wasn't likely to be something that would matter in my lifetime.

AI 2027 was much more impactful on me. It probably helps that I read it the same week I started playing with agent mode on GitHub Copilot. Seeing what AI can already do, especially compared to six months ago, and then seeing their projections made AI seem like something much more worth paying attention to.

Yeah, getting from here to being killed by rogue AI nanobots in less than five years still seems pretty far fetched to me. But, each of the steps in their scenario didn't seem completely outside the realm of possiblity.

So for me personally, my 80% confidence interval includes both things stagnating pretty much where they are now, but also something more like AI 2027. I suspect we'll be fine, but AGI seems like a real enough possibility that it's worth working on a contingency plan.

eholk commented on What Firefox trains are we in?   whattrainisitnow.com/... · Posted by u/joebig
kirk782 · a year ago
Was it done because Mozilla thought that Chrome's increasing version numbers would make ordinary people think that Chrome was ahead of Firefox ?
eholk · a year ago
This was back when Internet Explorer was at version 7. Some Mozilla folks told me they used to get questions like "when are you going to upgrade to Internet 7 like Microsoft?"

If I remember right, after Firefox 4 they skipped a few versions and started the train model, while also trying to de-emphasize the version number in marketing.

eholk commented on Bringing Exchange Support to Thunderbird   blog.thunderbird.net/2024... · Posted by u/campuscodi
Semaphor · 2 years ago
I recently tried Thunderbird instead of Outlook. It had the same issue as FF did before the quantum update: It's too damn slow. Switching between different folders with hundreds or thousands of mails has noticable delays, while in Outlook it's essentially instant.
eholk · 2 years ago
If you're using Windows, in my experience Thunderbird is essentially unusable until you add a Windows Defender exclusion for your Thunderbird profile.
eholk commented on U.S. senators reintroduce bill to make daylight saving time permanent   fox8.com/news/u-s-senator... · Posted by u/lxm
stevehawk · 5 years ago
and it would absolutely F the state of Indiana. We'd have to switch time zones.
eholk · 5 years ago
Would that mean Indiana goes back to the way they were before they started doing Daylight Savings Time?
eholk commented on Sentimental Versioning   sentimentalversioning.org... · Posted by u/zdw
djsumdog · 5 years ago
Firefox too. The rapid version numbers in web browsers are a nice contrast to the days of "forever IE6" comparability. Web compatibility back then was a nightmare.

Of course we're on the opposite end of that today, where two major browser engines are Chrome and WebKit(Safari), with Gecko often an afterthought.

eholk · 5 years ago
Firefox adopted rapid version numbers basically because the rest of the browsers did. For years Firefox was on 3.something, and they'd get questions from people saying things like "Microsoft is already on Internet 7, when are you going to support Internet 7?" If I recall right, Firefox skipped versions 5 and 6, and starting with 7 they decided to use a rapid version number scheme and deemphasize version numbers in their marketing.
eholk commented on New things in Android 11   blog.google/products/andr... · Posted by u/robbiet480
ninju · 5 years ago
No more 'cute' dessert names for each release :-(
eholk · 5 years ago
The names are still there internally. Android 10 was Quince Start, and Android 11 is Red Velvet Cake.

https://www.xda-developers.com/android-11-red-velvet-cake/

eholk commented on The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Covid-19   sciencedirect.com/science... · Posted by u/wavepruner
DenisM · 5 years ago
Except for all the skin cancer, right?

FWIW, I was told that when the Sun is above 45 degrees over the horizon you will accrue DNA damage, and it stacks up over your entire lifetime. There is no "reset" or "heal", it just adds up.

For that reason I'm doing my darnest best to stay in the shade between 9am and 3pm. Or covering clothing.

eholk · 5 years ago
I'd be really interested to see a comparison of the relative risks between skin cancer and vitamin D deficiency.

A lot of what I've read lately suggests we're discovering a lot of benefits of vitamin D that were previously unknown, and some evidence that the recommended vitamin D levels should be higher than they are.

For a generation or so we've told people the sun is dangerous because of skin cancer, and obviously skin cancer is really bad. But I wonder if we have a case of need to weight risks that are high cost, low probability (skin cancer) compared with low cost, high probability (low vitamins D complications). What is the overall effect of these two things?

u/eholk

KarmaCake day121July 12, 2012View Original