Readit NewsYou say this word is only required if it's a part of this whole sentence? OK, the other edit kept the whole sentence, but changed a single other word in it, which happened to be the subject.
The given situation is solvable only by the humans involved. They want different things. Either one of them has authority over the other, or they talk it over.
Of course, performance etc are a separate story but as far as the shape of the data goes, that's what the solution is
Apart from privacy concerns of your data being used or sold by the car vendor, government outreach is also a concern. There was a bill announced in the US for all new cars to be equipped with "driver impairment" tech which was called a "kill switch". Media rushed to say it's not really a kill switch, just "sensors or cameras to monitor the driver’s behaviors, head or eye movements" and "block the driver from operating the vehicle". So... a kill switch. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-402773429497
Anyway, I'm staying with my old gas Honda until it dies which is probably never with proper maintenance and eventually restoration. I'll never go electric. Modern cars are just smartphones on wheels at this point, and smartphones are just spying devices at this point.
They're good people at heart. Don't misunderstand them.
You’re right that everyone has been doing this for quite a while, it’s certainly not an Apple invention.
The Electric Light Company often covers Mac stuff and Activity Monitor is the tool you use to view this stuff in OS X, so it’s just the domain this article is focusing on.
"Unlike traditional Intel CPUs, CPU cores in Apple silicon chips can be run at a wide range of frequencies, as set by macOS."
The use of the word 'traditional' here is essentially gaslighting.
>According to the benchmarks, Redka is several times slower than Redis.
Still a cool project, don't get me wrong. But this kind of doesn't give me any incentive to switch.
It abandons Redis' in-memory data and sqlite's in-process speed... for what?
Reminds me of the comedian who, when asked, "How's your wife," would say, "Compared to what?"
I have an idea for a project that involves streaming 3 giabits of data per second from a USB 3.0 device out over a 10 gig Ethernet connection, and it was able to compare/contrast various levels of support for high-bandwidth USB 3 and Ethernet in multiple frameworks and languages.
And the whole conversation, with code examples, cost me 3 _cents_ of Anthropic credits.
My new fear is when people start asking AIs "Hey AI, here is my codebase, my org chart, and commit histories for all my employees - how can I reduce the number of humans I need to employ to get this project done?"
1. Good, detailed commits 2. Tests 3. Docstrings
You kind of lost the thread when you say, “act against the interests of American citizens and companies”. Bro, literally anyone could be using xz, and anyone could be using Red Hat. You’re only “acting against Americans” if you use it against Americans. I don’t know who was behind this, but a perfectly plausible scenario would be the NSA putting the backdoor in with an ostensibly Chinese login and then activating on machines hosted and controlled by people outside of the US.
Focusing on a specific distro is myopic. Red Hat is popular.
The HN crowd has come a long way from practically hero-worshipping Snowden to automatically assuming that 'state actor' must mean the countries marked evil by the US.
Yahoo acquired it and it became Yahoo mail.
So 27 or 28 years
But the company is a major defense contractor and it was very unusual for them to be involved in humanitarian work. So it made sense to question the requirements after a less generous reading. Detecting mostly occluded humans in a highly cluttered and destroyed urban environment has other use cases. They got as far as "highlighting the survivors with a laser designator" before I started to ask some very pointed questions and start discussing the ethical considerations of us helping to build a system to kill people.
I was asked to leave.
After that meeting the potential collaboration was rejected and it never came up again. The company continued shopping around other places to get help building their "earthquake rescue system".
Never get distracted. Always question the purpose of work. Consider ethics.
Getting another job can be a pain. Living with knowing what you helped to build would be much harder.