and the name of the function we use to access them is var()! Not customProperty().
Readit NewscantSpellSober commented on It is ok to say "CSS variables" instead of "custom properties" blog.kizu.dev/css-variabl... · Posted by u/eustoria
> a high dose (22 or 30 mg/70 kg) of psilocybin
What is this compared to a recreational dose? Are these patients getting high as part of their treatment?
cantSpellSober commented on The death of partying in the USA derekthompson.org/p/the-d... · Posted by u/tysone
>People these days don’t own real estate.
The home ownership rate has been 64%, plus or minus about 1%, for the last 45 years.
The number of first-time home owners has plummeted though
https://www.nar.realtor/research-and-statistics/research-rep...
cantSpellSober commented on Cursor hits $9B valuation ft.com/content/a7b34d53-a... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
Good for them. IMO they should ditch the editor though. I see no reason that they should tie themselves to one editor. It seems like a waste of time. If Claude code let me use me subscription I'd be off cursor pretty quick.
easier sell/setup
cantSpellSober commented on The Death of Daydreaming afterbabel.com/p/on-the-d... · Posted by u/isolli
> moments used to be given over to silent reflection or conversation with whoever is around
Noticeable on pubic transit particularly
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment
cantSpellSober commented on Why can't HTML alone do includes? frontendmasters.com/blog/... · Posted by u/susam
What's the ML in HTML stand for? I think that's probably the crux of the argument. Are we gonna evolve it past its name?
That's why I joked about flamebait, it's hypertext though, aren't anchors essentially a goToURL() click handler in some ways? Template partials seem like a basic part of this system.
> considered to be server-side
Good point! Wouldn't fetching a template partial happen the same way (like fetching an image?)
cantSpellSober commented on Why can't HTML alone do includes? frontendmasters.com/blog/... · Posted by u/susam
"Includes" functionality is considered to be server-side, i.e. handled outside of the web browser. HTML is client-side, and really just a markup syntax, not a programming language.
As the article says, the problem is a solved one. The "includes" issue is how every web design student learns about PHP. In most CMSes, "includes" become "template partials" and are one of the first things explained in the documentation.
There really isn't any need to make includes available through just HTML. HTML is a presentation format and doesn't do anything interesting without CSS and JS anyway.
Well said this is many students' intro to PHP. Why not `<include src=header.html/>` though?
Some content is already loaded asynchronously such as images, content below the fold etc.
> HTML is really just a markup syntax, not a programming language
flamebait detected :) It's a declarative language, interpreted by each browser engine separately.
cantSpellSober commented on Better typography with text-wrap pretty webkit.org/blog/16547/bet... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
Does anyone know how this contrasts with `text-align: justify` (mentioned in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43258709#43260606)?
In Chrome (can't test Safari), `text-wrap: pretty` has a much milder effect.
Should one use both together in the main text of your average blog? I checked, they do appear to make individual changes.
`text-align: justify` solves a different problem, it justifies your text; both the left and right edges of each line are aligned with the margins.
> Should one use both together in the main text of your average blog
Optimize for legibility; the properties are compatible.