If you think their response will reign inflation in check, we'll probably see the market 'crash' and a recession like the late 80s.
If you think their response will be soft, and persistent inflation is the new norm, we'll probably see the market act more like the 70s.
Maybe they walk the line, but I don't see how that's possible. Monetary policy is just so of-the-mark right now.
Another screwball is WFH. That could sap demand for large cities and push demand in suburbs and smaller towns.
The thing is you don't know the length of the password. It could be more than the number of hydrogen atoms in the universe, or 12. You still have to brute force or look up one possible solution (or collision thereof).
The whole thing just shows that a hash makes ZERO applicable inferable assertions about the message (password).
Thats the definition of evenly distributed hashing functions: change anything in the message, including length, and there will be no identifiable relation between the hashes of one messsage and the next you try,
function randomInt(n) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * n);
}
function randomPassword() {
let letters = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ';
let digits = '0123456789';
let punctuation = '!"#$%&\'()\*+,-./:;<=>?@[\\]^_`{|}~';
let s = letters.repeat(7) + digits.repeat(4) + punctuation.repeat(3);
let length = 14;
let res = Array.from({length}, (() =>
s[randomInt(s.length)])).join('');
return res;
}
looks like it's 14 characters long, and each character has an independent 72.8% / 8% / 19.2% chance of being a random letter / digit / punctuation. There are 94 symbols total, so 94^14 possible solutions; roughly 92 bits of entropy. Even if you assume 10 letters, 1 digit, 3 punctuations (the "likely" distribution) it's still 75 bits of entropy. You might be able to gain an advantage through knowledge of the PRNG state, but the PRNG in v8 (xorshift128+) has a period of 2^128 - 1.So not great odds...
In a movie whose title escapes me, Jack Nicholson plays an anger management therapist who is hired to coach someone 24h per day. He explicitly includes exposing his trainee to situations where he should display anger.
This whole 100% stoicism movement is quite suspect to me. It is mostly a thing for administrator types who read the 48 laws of power and some manosphere sites. It is also Orwellian, since complete suppression of emotions is a central theme in Orwell's books.
I've come to view it as a parlor trick for administrators to appear superhuman and unapproachable.
Actually creative and productive people are more in touch with their emotions and sometimes let them out.
The Z5 is better for baby pictures.
The d5600 is still better for hiking and travel pictures.
The Z5 is better under low-light and dynamic subject conditions. Particularly because the digital viewfinder is clearer in the dark, the eye/face autofocus and low light autofocus performance is much better (much fewer missed shots), the Z5 has sensor-shift stabilization, and there is no mirror slap affecting lower shutter speeds. For landscapes where there is lots of light, a lightweight and battery conservative d5600 still does the job excellently.
As long as you don't put more than ~30% of your money into a single asset (e.g. a house), then you're pretty certain to always make money in the long-term.
Just because the USA has federal administration that doesn't want to act on climate change right now doesn't mean that it won't get a greener administration in the future.
As for being a lost cause, isn't it preferable to minimize the effect, at least? would you rather the sea levels go up by 2.0 meters or 1.5 meters?